Go to Otherpower.com Home Page Go to Forcefield Shopping Cart Go to Wondermagnet.com Home Page
Front Page - [Homebrewed Electricity-- (wind) (solar) (hydro) (steam) (controls) (storage) (mechanical)] - Classifieds - Site News
Everything - Newbies - [Remote Living-- (housing) (heat) (light) (water)] - Rants & Opinion - Diaries - Our Products
Load Matching | 18 comments (18 topical, 0 editorial)
Re: Load Matching (3.00 / 0) (#14)
by SamoaPower on Mon Oct 16th, 2006 at 04:30:47 PM MST
(User Info)

Flux,
I'm curious about one of your comments.

"The dc current becomes much less distorted. I had hoped that this would benefit alternator efficiency as they really don't like rectifier loads. In fact I saw no improvement in overall efficiency and didn't chase this mode."

I would also think that an improvement in efficiency is possible using this scheme. I wonder why you, in fact, didn't see it.

If you're able to derive current from the portions of the input waveform that are below the main rectifier cut-in, it would seem that total output should increase.

Of course, the closed-loop bandwidth would have to accomodate the alternator frequency  to allow the PWM to follow the input waveform. Given the high ratio of PWM frequency to input frequency, this would not seem difficult.

Have you had any further thoughts about this aspect?


[ Parent ]



Load Matching | 18 comments (18 topical, 0 editorial)

Menu
· create account
· How to use the board
· FAQs
· search the board
· Google search the board
· Old Otherpower Board

Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password:

Powered by Scoop
You must be a registered user to post here. It's easy and free, and the link is on the upper right side of your page.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Postings are owned by the poster, but may be deleted or moved at the ADMIN's sole discretion. The Rest © 2003 Forcefield.
You can Email the board ADMIN here. PLEASE include the username you signed up with!