And, through ham-fistedly running out of other alternatives, the bearing is at the top, with the whole device hanging down from a 'sprung' pillar. A very small gen could fit in there at the top of the post, with wires running down the post.
I'll take its photograph 'planted' in my garden tomorrow, and see how long it takes to fall apart.
Then I can think about a real VAWT generating my usual milliWatts, when we get any breeze at all...
In any case, I'll see how quickly this one rotates.
What's the relationship between rpm, windspeed, and other design parameters for a simple Savonius VAWT? (I'm gonna Google anyway, but I'm sure that you guys know it off by heart...)
Rgds
Damon
For a 1 foot diameter rotor the circumference will be 3.14 feet so in a windspeed of 10mph, the outer edge of the rotor will be going 52800 feet/hour or 88 feet/minute.
Dividing the circumferencial speed by the actual circumference gives you 88/3.14=28rpm
I believe optimum loading for a savonius is when it's running at a tsr of 1/3 so to extract maximum power you'd want your alternator to hold it down to a little over 9rpm in a 10mph wind.
Hope this helps[ Parent ]
I might just have the materials for a 1ft diam S to hand, so expecting ~1rpm/mph/ftdiam is a decent rule of thumb at least. Hideously un-metric though! B^>
Damon[ Parent ]
You can't really say an s-vawt made from 6" pipe will spin this fast in this wind. Besides the height, you've got weight, air gap, bearings, general build quality, load, etc....lots of things play a part, even with a simple-S design.
Then, are you really talking about a simple Savonius? To me that means each blade is a half circle, the gap is about 18%, the blades don't overlap, there's likely a center rod and you've got end plates. Or are you talking about a modified simple S?..
I consider my quick vawt to be a modified simple S...the blades aren't half circles (though they could be), they do overlap a little, there's no center rod, the gap is totally configurable and a bottom plate is all that's really mandatory (to protect the bottom bearings from the weather).
Past about that point you get into the more complicated designs/problems and all hell breaks loose. Then you start pondering the aspect ratio..wider is better for low winds but is lower rpm, tall and skinny for high winds and high rpms. Oh, should I use those "J" looking blades?..those are more efficient. Etc.
There's just so many variables.[ Parent ]
Ron Adventure is just bad planning." -- Roald Amundsen [ Parent ]
Having a good 'feel' will get you as close as running the numbers can anyway, all things considered.[ Parent ]
I don't do build quality! What do you take me for: a civil engineer? B^>
Anyway, my little prototype does at least turn in a tiny breeze: I'll try and get a little video before it falls apart...