the Otherpower.com Discussion Board || Comments A mono pole magnetic structure? [Comments Locked]

Front Page - [Homebrewed Electricity-- (wind) (solar) (hydro) (steam) (controls) (storage) (mechanical)] - Classifieds - Site News
Everything - Newbies - [Remote Living-- (housing) (heat) (light) (water)] - Rants & Opinion - Diaries - Our Products

A mono pole magnetic structure? [Comments Locked] | 37 comments (37 topical, 0 editorial)

Re: A mono pole magnetic structure? (3.00 / 0) (#6)
by ghurd on Fri Feb 29th, 2008 at 06:57:06 AM MST
(User Info)

Perhaps you should let the 1000s of PhDs worrking on it do this,
go back to OU,
and know who you are talking about before making a statement like that.
G-

[ Parent ]

Re: A mono pole magnetic structure? (3.00 / 0) (#7)
by aimulti on Fri Feb 29th, 2008 at 07:07:49 AM MST
(User Info)

I know exactly what I am talking about having been involved with permanent magnet research for the last fourteen years, funded by a major US company and have employed several Phd's over that period who freely admit to knowing less than me in many aspects of the science.

It is sad to see so little interest in theoretical magnetic problems and so much rudeness here.

[ Parent ]

Re: A mono pole magnetic structure? (3.00 / 0) (#9)
by Flux on Fri Feb 29th, 2008 at 08:43:28 AM MST
(User Info)

Sorry I did not intend to be rude. If you use your skill to develop better magnets we shall all be delighted to benefit from it. unfortunately any fundamental understanding of how magnets work is not going to produce anyone a better alternator.

We have all benefited immensely from the development of better magnets, but that is a field beyond the average persons capability. This is not the place for fundamental discussion on magnetic theory but I am sure there are such places on the internet.

One day if you make a better magnet then we shall all be grateful but I suspect that you will not be making a better windmill as the concept of unit poles doesn't work out too well and the homopolar generator remains in the land of one day wonders.

Flux

[ Parent ]

Re: A mono pole magnetic structure? (3.00 / 0) (#16)
by aimulti on Fri Feb 29th, 2008 at 04:43:18 PM MST
(User Info)

Dear Flux,

I appreciate your apology. Never the less I cannot see how theory and practice can be separated as one is a function of the other. It helps to know what you are doing but you do it.

Regarding a 'better magnet' or 'alternator', all I can say is watch the science news later this year and then repeat that statement.

What 'science news' you may ask. Well, you will know 'what news' when you see it.

Warmest regards,

aimulti

[ Parent ]

Re: A mono pole magnetic structure? (3.00 / 0) (#12)
by finnsawyer on Fri Feb 29th, 2008 at 09:00:51 AM MST
(User Info)

You may know what you are talking about, but it's too bad that you couldn't convey that knowledge to us. So much verbiage, so little sense....
GeoM
[ Parent ]

A mono pole magnetic structure? [Comments Locked] | 37 comments (37 topical, 0 editorial)

Menu

· create account
· How to use the board
· FAQs
· search the board
· Google search the board
· Old Otherpower Board

Login

Make a new account

Username:

Password:

You must be a registered user to post here. It's easy and free, and the link is on the upper right side of your page.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Postings are owned by the poster, but may be deleted or moved at the ADMIN's sole discretion. The Rest © 2003 Forcefield.
You can Email the board ADMIN here. PLEASE include the username you signed up with!