Tom makes a valid point, there is quite abit of 'dilution' going on with the subsance of replys, overall, in general.

 I submit, that if 3 people request a delition of a reply,in following replies, in succesion, that it should be done without an e-mail corrisponence(sp?)...

JW

First, make no mistake, I respect you as a doer who shares his experiences.

no big brothers please....

Uh, did you actually read what I wrote? Doesn't look that way from this comment?

Its more like friendly advice on how to submit than "Big Brother" stuff.

Figures that about 1 in 5 actually read and understand the post as it was intended.

You see, Big Brother wouldn't be explaining he would just do it and do it to anyone who complained they thought he was doing it.

This is just to give them a chance to resubmit after some thought. The original post stays long enough for them to read why it happened.

Please go back and READ what I actually wrote rather than just assume the worst, Really.

By all means, disagree if you actually disagree with what was written, not simply to disagree with me, please.

I don't have any older brothers but the guys I know who had big brothers had a defender, a teacher and a mentor, plus the occasional butt kicker. Maybe I misunderstood your reference to "big brother"? In this sense we could all use a big brother, I think.

TomW