Go to Otherpower.com Home Page Go to Forcefield Shopping Cart Go to Wondermagnet.com Home Page
Front Page - [Homebrewed Electricity-- (wind) (solar) (hydro) (steam) (controls) (storage) (mechanical)] - Classifieds - Site News
Everything - Newbies - [Remote Living-- (housing) (heat) (light) (water)] - Rants & Opinion - Diaries - Our Products
Star confiuration | 25 comments (25 topical, editorial)
Re: Star confiuration (3.00 / 0) (#22)
by mbeland on Wed Mar 5th, 2008 at 03:15:12 PM MST
(User Info)

Thanks Peter for the schematics,

I understand you would have to run 6 wires instead of 3 if the rectifiers are down the tower or instead of 2 if they are up but couldn't these wires be smaller since each of them takes less current?

Also, instead of having a tacho sensor with wires up and down the tower, couldn't it be simply some device to measure the output from the mill (I guess in current would be best) and trigger the contactors above a given current value?

Thanks for helping me understand,

Martin
eau, soleil, le vent
Eau, soleil, le vent
[ Parent ]



Re: Star confiuration (3.00 / 0) (#23)
by dinges on Wed Mar 5th, 2008 at 04:12:35 PM MST
(User Info)

Martin,

Assuming that in all three cases the same amount of power would be lost in the wiring:

In the case of 3 lines (AC) coming down the tower vs. 2 (DC) coming the tower: yes, with 3 wires (more or less in parallel) you could use thinner wires and still end up with the same line loss. The new wires could be 20% or 25% less in diameter. I'm not sure which of the two figures is correct, still pondering that myself and won't get into detail here, as I'm already accused of thread hijacking. The difference is mainly academic anyway.

In the case of 6 lines (with star/delta at ground level)  vs. 3 lines coming down the tower, since the wires are now in series (2 sets of 3 wires), each of the 6 wires would actually have to be thicker than the wires in the 3-line-AC system. Since total length of the wires is now doubled, area of each wire should be double too (or in other words, diameter should be (sqrt(2)) = 1.41 as large.

At least, if I understand things correctly. If not I'll be no doubt corrected by others :)

Peter.

[ Parent ]



Re: Star confiuration (3.00 / 0) (#24)
by dinges on Wed Mar 5th, 2008 at 04:27:34 PM MST
(User Info)

Better explanation:

http://www.windstuffnow.com/main/3_phase_basics.htm

Peter.

[ Parent ]



Star confiuration | 25 comments (25 topical, 0 editorial)

Menu
· create account
· How to use the board
· FAQs
· search the board
· Google search the board
· Old Otherpower Board

Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password:

Powered by Scoop
You must be a registered user to post here. It's easy and free, and the link is on the upper right side of your page.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Postings are owned by the poster, but may be deleted or moved at the ADMIN's sole discretion. The Rest © 2003 Forcefield.
You can Email the board ADMIN here. PLEASE include the username you signed up with!