the Otherpower.com Discussion Board || Comments Small scale solar MPPT wins 21%

Front Page - [Homebrewed Electricity-- (wind) (solar) (hydro) (steam) (controls) (storage) (mechanical)] - Classifieds - Site News
Everything - Newbies - [Remote Living-- (housing) (heat) (light) (water)] - Rants & Opinion - Diaries - Our Products

Small scale solar MPPT wins 21% | 47 comments (47 topical, 0 editorial)

Re: Small scale solar MPPT wins 21% (3.00 / 0) (#5)
by elt on Wed Aug 27th, 2008 at 08:24:01 AM MST
(User Info)

In hindsight, it was probably a mistake - I thought that painting the inside of the box blue would make it look more like a "real" panel at a distance. Now I think that it adds to the heating and voltage loss. At any rate, the glazing is clear Lexan.

> [...] C3 can go away

C3 is a .22 uF polypropylene cap; IIRC, it was suggested that I put one in a different design to protect the FET from switching spikes and I just copied it into this one. That cap is big and expensive, I'd be happy to put it back in the cap pile if you think it's not needed here.

Thank you,
- Ed.

[ Parent ]

Re: Small scale solar MPPT wins 21% (3.00 / 0) (#6)
by tecker on Wed Aug 27th, 2008 at 09:41:21 AM MST
(User Info)

There's no spikes the battery doesn't obsorb here and no doubt the caps is retaining battery voltage . Keep working on it

[ Parent ]

Small scale solar MPPT wins 21% | 47 comments (47 topical, 0 editorial)

Menu

· create account
· How to use the board
· FAQs
· search the board
· Google search the board
· Old Otherpower Board

Login

Make a new account

Username:

Password:

You must be a registered user to post here. It's easy and free, and the link is on the upper right side of your page.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Postings are owned by the poster, but may be deleted or moved at the ADMIN's sole discretion. The Rest © 2003 Forcefield.
You can Email the board ADMIN here. PLEASE include the username you signed up with!