I'm calling BS on this one, prove to me your works posted here aren't public domain? I don't want emotional slants either, I don't want you just saying what you think is correct, show me legal proof and by legal proof I mean internationally accepted proof.
Sorry Bruce but I'm not doing your homework for you. I made a statement, you want to challenge it, YOU show ME the proof what I say isn't right.
I have done my homework some time ago. I'm not handing it to anyone on a plate that can't be bothered to put the time or effort in to find out and educate themselves. If your level of interest doesn't run to that, fine. I would suggest however it would be prudent not to "call BS" on anything however you have not researched for yourself.
I know JW has the overriding ability to delete an entire account no matter what the MODs say, but then again he knows full well the amount of work that goes into fixing broken links (He's had to fix bunches in the past.
If JW is the supreme power, he seems to have a much better position than some others here in he recognises what is and is not the property of the forum. Be it pictures or words, it's the same thing and you can look that up if you care to or claim it BS till the cows come home as far as I'm concerned.
Up to you to be informed or just think you are.
I have to say, you keep going on about the amount of time to delete an account and how you are so busy and mods have lives etc, yet you have time to post multiple times a day on this one topic alone. Can you see the conflict between what you are saying and what you are doing?
This is the sort of thing that make me more interested in a straightforward answer to the question that could have already been stated and put this to bed.
Again, I'm not stirring, I have just asked ( a couple of times now) for a straightforward answer. Others are avoiding that and are doing the stirring by making accusations about others. A straight answer is all that is required. I don't know why some seem so damn afraid to clarify what the position is and are getting upset over it.
The more it's avoided the more one can only wonder if some don't know or don't want to give an answer and are trying to side track things. If you don't want to participate in the thread, you don't have to do that either.
I was not aware whom JW is but if he is the forum owner, then the question seems to have been answered by him more directly than others.
A clear statement of forum policy on this "great question" would be helpful.