Go to Otherpower.com Home Page Go to Forcefield Shopping Cart Go to Wondermagnet.com Home Page
Front Page - [Homebrewed Electricity-- (wind) (solar) (hydro) (steam) (controls) (storage) (mechanical)] - Classifieds - Site News
Everything - Newbies - [Remote Living-- (housing) (heat) (light) (water)] - Reviews - Diaries - Our Products
Molecular Layer Electrodeposition of Semiconductors


By iFred, Section Solar
Posted on Tue Sep 07, 2004 at 10:56:38 PM MST
Electrodeposition of Semiconductors


Molecular Layer Electrodeposition of Semiconductors
Compound semiconductor films are commonly synthesized by
molecular beam epitaxy, chemical vapor deposition, or vapor phase
epitaxy in the fabrication of optoelectronic devices. To date, stringent
material quality requirements have excluded electrodeposition
for synthesis of semiconductor compounds for this application.
In a recent report, Shalini Menezes of InterPhases Research in
California described a novel electrochemical deposition scheme for
preparing molecular layer structures of semiconductor materials.

The successive electrodeposition of monolayers of the compound
was performed from a single electrolyte containing all of the constituent
elements. Menezes showed that controlling the kinetics of
the competing reactions by careful regulation of temperature, electrolyte
composition, deposition potential, solution volume, and
anodic dissolution potential is critical to producing a film of the
desired stoichiometry. The author demonstrated the versatility and
unique features of this method, known as molecular layer electrodeposition
(MLE), by growing CuInSe2 films that are commercially
important in solar cell applications.

In other words "electrochemical deposition!!"

Link about semiconductor making...
http://www.tpub.com/neets/book7/24f.htm

Doping materials
http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/blsolar5.htm

Using organic Semiconductors and Conductors
http://www.tda.com/eMatls/ntype.htm

VERY COOL! I never really thought about it but, lets just say that you start with a peice of metal, place it into a chemical bath of some dilluited chemical that produces a postive layer like a solution containg "boron" and a negitive solution "phosphorous" in two different beakers, apply charge to the plate and more or less produce a cell after dipping and creating the electrochemical deposition that is required. It would be cheap and fast to produce, even if it had impuritys and was less then say 7% efficient or so...

What do you think?

Molecular Layer Electrodeposition of Semiconductors | 7 comments (7 topical)

Cheap vs efficient (3.00 / 0) (#1)
by Norm on Wed Sep 08, 2004 at 08:09:42 AM MST

 Cheap and efficient...you have to admire some peoples thinking. For example I read where they were trying to make solar cells as efficient as possible...then someone asked the question Why not make them cheaper even 70% if it were to cost only half as much as the 95% ones?
 If some of us wanted a flywheel we would take an old truck tire and do the best we could with it while technology was trying to make a superflywheel that spins at mega-rpms and gives you 500 miles per charge.
                   it's all fun 'tho...
                 ( :>) Norm  
( :>) Norm


Re: Cheap vs efficient (3.00 / 0) (#2)
by Chagrin on Wed Sep 08, 2004 at 08:22:09 AM MST

Would 25 kWh get you 500 miles?

http://www.beaconpower.com/products/EnergyStorageSystems/SmartEnergy25kWh.htm

Would love to see some of the engineering in these things.

[ Parent ]



Re: Cheap vs efficient (3.00 / 0) (#3)
by jacquesm on Wed Sep 08, 2004 at 08:33:14 AM MST

Nope, not even close... a car once accelerated needs a good bit of power just to keep cruising, 20...30KW in the smallest of vehicles. so 25KWh will give you (assuming 100% conversion, which is a pipe dream) no more than 100 Miles, and probably way less than that.
www.greenbits.com
[ Parent ]


Re: Cheap vs efficient (3.00 / 0) (#4)
by jacquesm on Wed Sep 08, 2004 at 08:42:21 AM MST

bad form to respond to my own post, but let me clarify that a bit. I am assuming that you are never going to move more than 100 mph in any vehicle, and if that takes at least 20..30 KWh then that places an upper limit on the amount of distance you can cover with that energy.

Energy storage systems using flywheels have been used in transportation devices (most notably a couple of buses and a prototype developed by American Flywheels Inc), but without a whole lot of success.

The big key in developing a flywheel based storage system is the 'self discharge' based on drag and friction (air around the wheel and bearings). The first can be combatted by using an evacuuated chamber, the second by using magnetic bearings.

There has been some progress in this field, a static (no control mechanism) magnetic bearing has been designed, tested and subsequently patented using a rotating halbach array with compensation windings.

The biggest use for flywheel based storage systems right now is in 'ridethrough' applications for hospitals and other places that need 100% reliable power. You realy don't want the lights to go off while you're on the operating table :)

These systems typically are in the 10...100 KWh range, but are designed to liberate that in the few seconds that it takes to fire up the diesel and take over from the failed grid. The KWh rating is misleading, it suggests that you can draw that power out over a longer period of time, but really you usually can not, the self discharge rate (usually a few % per minute of operation) gets in the way of that.
www.greenbits.com
[ Parent ]



Re: Cheap vs efficient (3.00 / 0) (#7)
by juiced on Wed Jan 12, 2005 at 11:06:07 PM MST

Ive actually read that a car, once at the desired speed requires relevantly little power, as low as 5 HP to keep its momentum. A hill will bring it up to some 75% of full HP use and acceleration on a hill with all electrical systems on, 97% or so. No links off hand though.

Canada's -Debatable- A.E./R.E Debate Site
News, discussions and debates!
www.juiced.ca

[ Parent ]


Re: Cheap vs efficient (3.00 / 0) (#5)
by Ungrounded Lightning Rod on Wed Sep 08, 2004 at 09:56:35 AM MST

25 kWh would be about 18 HP Hr, and would let a small car cruise on the level for about an hour - though it wouldn't get it up to speed.

But I bet that flywheel system is:
 a) Too heavy, and
 b) doesn't have bearings suitable for use in a vehicle (being designed for stationary use).

Having your car blow up if you hit a bump is a bummer.

[ Parent ]



Re: Cheap vs efficient (3.00 / 0) (#6)
by TomW on Wed Sep 08, 2004 at 10:56:51 AM MST


Lets not forget / overlook the gyroscopic effect of a flywheel on such mundane things as cornering, large dips and collisions ;=>

T

The Truth is the Truth, even if no one believes it; and a lie is a lie even if everyone believes it


[ Parent ]



Molecular Layer Electrodeposition of Semiconductors | 7 comments (7 topical)
Display: Sort:
Menu
· create account
· How to use the board
· FAQs
· search the board
· Google search the board

Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password:

Total Views
  55 Scoop users have viewed this posting.

Related Links
· http://www .tpub.com/neets/book7/24f.htm
· http://inv entors.about.com/library/inventors/blsolar5.htm
· http://www .tda.com/eMatls/ntype.htm
· Also by iFred

Powered by Scoop
You must be a registered user to post here. It's easy and free, and the link is on the upper right side of your page.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Postings are owned by the poster, but may be deleted or moved at the ADMIN's sole discretion. The Rest © 2009 Forcefield.
You can Email the board ADMIN here. PLEASE include the username you signed up with!