| Hi everyone,
Lots of interest in heating lately, and there is always interest in efficiency.
The two got me thinking in reverse (as usual), about a combination of the 2.
It started with 100W at 12V will be more lossy than 100W at 24V.
What would be the result if the heating element were in series with the battery?
The battery would still maintain a full charge.
Less wear and tear on the battery.
Less thermal stress on the stator(?).
Less line losses.
The battery would let the blades get going before a load is introduced.
The increased windmill power, feeding a resistance at a higer voltage, will reduce stator and line losses, meaning more watts of heat in the house.
Here is why I say that.
From W=I^2xR, 1A in 1 ohm is 1W, but 5A in 1 ohm is 25W. That 25W is being transmitted at a higher voltage with better efficiency than a battery voltage dump load.
For a 12V system, and a 1 ohm heating element...
With 1A is 13V (12+1), series resistance heat is 1W, 7.7% of the power into the system.
With 5A is 17V (12+5), series resistance heat is 25W, 29.4% of the power into the system.
With 20A is 32V (12+20), series resistance heat is 400W, 63% of the power into the system. Etc.
With a 3 step dump load the first step could be a make-before-break SPST relay removing the heaters short. Maybe the second step could add more resistance too.
A system set to furl a little too early may benefit with some adjustment. Around here the batteries generally would be full a day before it furls anyway.
Just a little different take on the capacitor controlled heating idea.
The whole idea may be better thought of as a "pre-dump load".
I can't do it here anyway, but does anyone have any comments about this line of thought?
G-
|
|
|
Total Views
|
|
180 Scoop users have viewed this posting.
|
|