We'll start here,

http://www.integener.com/HomeLinksAndProjs/Page01.htm

Please scroll down to the link to Nasa and the comment,"This NASA webpage puts the physical source of the aerodynamic lift force right (while other pages on this website debunk erroneous explanations)".

Next lets go to the Nasa website here,

http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/newton3.html

This link speaks about "Principia Mathematica Philosophiae Naturalis"  and in particular the third law of motion and how it applies to lift. Support for Anthonies theory?

Let's go on and follow the link that is the word lift.

http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/right2.html

Here we see some talk about lift from flow turning or deflection as the words seem to be used interchangably. Still looking good for Anthony. There's even mention of the fact that some incorrect theories of lift come from ignoring this this reaction.

But lets go back to the top and have a look at "airplane wings" since these do after all resemble turbine blades more than spinning balls and rotating cylinders.

http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/factors.html

Well at a glance it seems Nasa is saying that all you need to do to create lift is turn a flow of air. Shall we investigate further or shall we rest assurred Anthony has uncovered the truth and Nasa concurrs?

What the heck lets just have a quick peek at whats behind the "wing size" link since we're allready there and Anthony has told us what shape it should be.

http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/size.html

Well, nice little link there. talks about drag, the lift equation and some planform stuff too but what's this about drag? I haven't heard much from Anthony on drag. An what's this about "pressure variation" back up at the top of the page. I could be mistaken but I thought the "bent" or "turned air flow theory" didn't care about pressure as it was a part of the incorrect theory of lift.

I think we better have a look.

http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/presar.html

And there you have it folks. the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

And P.S. the images Anthony has posted above are taken from the Nasa web site so basicly you can find all Anthonies book has to offer and more in it's unaltered form  from a source you should be able to trust, including imagry, at the Nasa website.

Feel free to continue learning there as it really is about the most complete source of introductory and advance aerodynamics on the net!

Wind energy needs a better theoretical foundation than it presently has and this booklet is just the start of something to fill this need. The many wind turbines up on the ridges here in Tehachapi certainly see periods of inactivity and the many homeowners here who have installed the small 7 foot tall Harbor Freight windmills in their yards for decorative purposes do not have any hesitation about boasting how their "wind turbines" operate so continuously. I honestly wish to answer all questions asked about some of the issues raised but find myself unable to get to the root of some of these no doubt well meaning but unnecessarily extended comments except just to offer my thanks.

It is a nice booklet and many people have copies of it. It says what has always needed to be said about the lift principle and wind energy. The public loves to learn about concepts that have always been so vague and mysterious.