Go to Otherpower.com Home Page Go to Forcefield Shopping Cart Go to Wondermagnet.com Home Page
Front Page - [Homebrewed Electricity-- (wind) (solar) (hydro) (steam) (controls) (storage) (mechanical)] - Classifieds - Site News
Everything - Newbies - [Remote Living-- (housing) (heat) (light) (water)] - Reviews - Diaries - Our Products
Energy Ball


By rpcancun, Section Wind
Posted on Thu Sep 18, 2008 at 05:38:52 PM MST
:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,423850,00.html

40% more efficient?
Does anybody have any info on this?

Thx

Rob

Energy Ball | 11 comments (11 topical)

Re: Energy Ball (3.00 / 0) (#1)
by Jeff on Thu Sep 18, 2008 at 12:04:20 PM MST

Here's another link that provides more info.

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Home_Energy_Energy_Ball

Lot's of blade-type VAWT's use at least some of the venturi principle. If you have Air-flow or fluid dynamics software, you could evaluate each of the many types of these on the market, or maybe your own design. Of course, not evryone has that type of computer & software.

Here's another one making good use of the Venturi principle:

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:FloDesign_Wind_Turbine

Rural McG



Re: Energy Ball (3.00 / 0) (#2)
by wdyasq on Thu Sep 18, 2008 at 01:47:08 PM MST

Using the handy calculator off the IRC site and numbers from:

http://www.home-energy.com/engels/ebv100technical.htm

These numbers show up:

  1. 1 watts possible from 1.1 m dia prop (1.0 m^2) in 36 km/Hr wind (density of 1.225000) 93.1 watts output assuming generator is 80% efficient and Cp of 0.20
  2. 8 watts possible from 1.1 m dia prop (1.0 m^2) in 61 km/Hr wind (density of 1.225000) 457.6 watts output assuming generator is 80% efficient and Cp of 0.20
So, the numbers are real, or close to it. 10m/s-36km/hr-22.5mph is a bit breezy for my tastes and the rated power at 17m/s-61.2km/hr-38.2mph is quite breezy and just short of tropical storm windspeeds. That would not be an area one would care to live in if the winds were constant.

But, it won't be my money being spent on it and it won't be mounted to my roof.

Ron
Adventure is just bad planning." -- Roald Amundsen



Re: Energy Ball (3.00 / 0) (#3)
by wooferhound on Thu Sep 18, 2008 at 02:24:54 PM MST

Here is a Homemade one . . . sort of ...
http://www.fieldlines.com/story/2008/4/13/154235/759

W o o f -={(



Re: Energy Ball (3.00 / 0) (#4)
by CmeBREW on Thu Sep 18, 2008 at 05:23:16 PM MST

And to think I had thought I was inventing something new!  I never seen that 'Ball mill' before. Earlier this summer, I had a dream about something similar to that and so I built it the next day in a few hours.  I called it the HawtVawt. It was made with PVC pipe. (6")





Maybe next summer I will try again. It did freak me out that it didn't at least work some though.  I even tried flipping the blades backwards-- but no-go.

But I am not too smart, so maybe they figured out something that works!!!

Thanks for sharing the links. Maybe I can find the answer(s) as to why mine did not work.




Re: Energy Ball (3.00 / 0) (#5)
by Ungrounded Lightning Rod on Thu Sep 18, 2008 at 06:28:05 PM MST

You seem to be trying to build a Darrieus with the axis horizontal.  This would pull power from a crosswind.

But you need the blades to be an airfoil shape, with a curved leading edge and a pointed trailing edge.  (The wind has to attach to the blade from a number of angles on the curved leading edge and exit at right angles to the axis from the pointed trailing edge.)

And it probably won't be self-starting with just the blades.  So you'll have to spin it up to get it going.  Either by running the genny as a motor or hanging on an extra starter motor, or by attaching a smaller, drag-type self-starting mill, scaled down to get the same RPM despite the drastically different tip speed in normal operation.  (Say a Savonius.  Figure about an 8-to-1 ratio of diameters, since the Savonius will be running at a TSR of about .8 and the Darrieus will want something in the 6-7 range.)

[ Parent ]



Re: Energy Ball (3.00 / 0) (#7)
by windstuffnow on Thu Sep 18, 2008 at 09:19:35 PM MST

 Nice machine Cmebrew !  The rear should have similar blades as an HAWT to start and maintain the spin, lift from the forward blades would or at least should, in theory, add to the power extraction from lift... The main problem I see is getting the blades up to speed.  You may have never reached the speed they needed to start lifting.

 I'm not a big fan of high speed VAWT's overall because of the constant maintenance.  Basically a failure waiting to happen unless thier watched and inspected continuously.  

 Your definately thinking out of the box.. keep it up you'll find success in the strangest places.  
.  

 
Have Fun! Windstuff Ed
[ Parent ]



Re: Energy Ball (3.00 / 0) (#6)
by CmeBREW on Thu Sep 18, 2008 at 07:54:11 PM MST

In my dream I wanted something different from a Vawt. I wanted something faster than a darrius. It was suppose to be more like that 'ball mill' Rob referred to.  I thought (drempt) it would be much more efficient than a Vawt since all the blades push the same direction,(WAY less drag and opposing forces than a Vawt) and it MIGHT make a nice horizontal vortex once it got going which would (could) add to the speed and such.

It was perfectly balanced and if you slightly pushed anywhere on any of the blades while stopped, it would propel nice in the same direction.  In a good wind (say 16-20mph) , I would spin it fast with my hand, but it would slow down and only turn slowly in the big wind.  It was just a quick, crude proto, but it freaked me out that it didn't do better than it did.  Maybe wider blades that go more vertical??

In my dream the HawtVawt ran like a jet. But in reality it was a nightmare!!

But that 'Ball mill' looks interesting to me, but on a bigger scale.
Thanks for the link Rob.  Always trying new things.



Re: Energy Ball (3.00 / 0) (#8)
by wooferhound on Thu Sep 18, 2008 at 09:51:32 PM MST

It looks like a Dual prop to me



A prop on the front, The shaft is reduced in the middle, then another prop on the back.

W o o f -={(



Re: Energy Ball (3.00 / 0) (#9)
by thirteen on Fri Sep 19, 2008 at 09:01:21 PM MST

Wasn't something like this done for ship power on the oceans a couple of years ago. Used as a new type of sail or just for power assist with the deisel powered engines. Looks like it works. I wonder how it works in the cold and snowy winter conditions with the snow going thru it?



Re: Energy Ball (3.00 / 0) (#10)
by zeebag on Sun Sep 21, 2008 at 03:29:04 AM MST

CmeBREW nice thinking out of the box. Awesome machine you built there. From which material did you made those? Is it efficient?



Re: Energy Ball (3.00 / 0) (#11)
by CmeBREW on Sun Sep 21, 2008 at 05:43:53 PM MST

Zeebag-      That prototype I attempted did NOT work at all. No need to even hook a generator up to it. The rotor design was (evidently) a total failure.(so far that is)

What got me interested in something like that was a concept mill I had seen a couple years ago from a German designer-- it was called the "Windus".

 http://www.treehugger.com/files/2005/09/der_windwandler.php

They evidently were not able to start the company. There website no longer works.                             http://www.windwandler.de/

    Or  www.windwandler.com
It was difficult for me to even find a picture of it.
The high output they claimed was, in my opinion, outrageously over stated. (3.8K If I recall)  
Who knows if the thing even worked at all.  

But that "Ball mill" is certainly being made from a company at least,, even though I certainly do not believe there stated output either.  I'm sure it does some decent power though. But As we can see there is no aerofoil shape to the blades for lift, which means more drag than a Hawt. The blades look somewhat flimsy. But it still looks very interesting to me though.

I highly doubt anyone could ever beat the Hawt in a proper clean,high location, but what I dream of making is something that looks good on a roof top and that people (neihbors) won't even know what it is. (even if it can only do HALF the power of a similar size Hawt for a small power system)

Also it has to be more quiet than a small hawt so a person can put a few of them on one's roof since the roof is usually not a good place to put a mill.


[ Parent ]



Energy Ball | 11 comments (11 topical)
Display: Sort:
Menu
· create account
· How to use the board
· FAQs
· search the board
· Google search the board

Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password:

Total Views
  150 Scoop users have viewed this posting.

Related Links
· http://www .foxnews.com/story/0,2933,423850,00.html
· Also by rpcancun

Powered by Scoop
You must be a registered user to post here. It's easy and free, and the link is on the upper right side of your page.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Postings are owned by the poster, but may be deleted or moved at the ADMIN's sole discretion. The Rest © 2009 Forcefield.
You can Email the board ADMIN here. PLEASE include the username you signed up with!