Go to Otherpower.com Home Page Go to Forcefield Shopping Cart Go to Wondermagnet.com Home Page
Front Page - [Homebrewed Electricity-- (wind) (solar) (hydro) (steam) (controls) (storage) (mechanical)] - Classifieds - Site News
Everything - Newbies - [Remote Living-- (housing) (heat) (light) (water)] - Reviews - Diaries - Our Products
Ultra-low-power Web server


By DamonHD, Section Diaries
Posted on Fri Jul 03, 2009 at 05:16:58 PM MST
ARM, Linux, Java, conservation geekgasm

Hi,

I hope to run most of my Web sites, email, etc, off this (~5W) or something similar in the future (replacing my current ~18W laptop):

http://www.marvell.com/products/embedded_processors/developer/kirkwood/sheevaplug.jsp

also see:

http://gbenson.net/?p=137

So I'm going to get familiar with this one since and wait for the new round of ARM-based netbooks/laptops and similar.

Uses less power than most lamps, even low-power lamps! Less than my ADSL Internet modem...

Rgds

Damon

Ultra-low-power Web server | 46 comments (46 topical)

Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#1)
by dnix71 on Fri Jul 03, 2009 at 01:10:52 PM MST

Solid state hd? How much storage? Can you connect a local monitor? USB for keyboard and mouse is easy, but a usb to vga monitor would require a hardware adapter.



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#3)
by DamonHD on Fri Jul 03, 2009 at 01:59:55 PM MST

Hi,

It has a USB/serial console access for emergencies I guess but most of the time I'd access it as I do my current server, via SSH in one or more xterm sessions from my Mac or other laptop.  No need for graphics support at all.

The plug has a slot for a SDHC memory card, ie up to 32GB.

I need something like 100GB+ storage, which I could do with a slowish external power-efficient hard disc or solid-state mass storage, which would have to be have a very power-efficient sleep mode.  I would expect to cache frequently-accessed on the SDHC.

Unless I put in a USB hub (or put in some clever Ethernet based stuff for example) then I can't get at my current digital inputs of off-grid solar system battery state-of-charge and nor could I run my X-10 automation stuff.  The former would be more of a shame than the latter.

In the end I may end up with something more like this which exposes more direct I/O:

http://www.marvell.com/products/embedded_processors/developer/kirkwood/openrd.jsp

In any case there is real hope that it could be run 24x7 throughout the year from my 120Wp 12V.40Ah off-grid system that powers my office lighting.

The ADSL modem would remain on-grid for the time being.

Rgds

Damon

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#2)
by Madscientist267 on Fri Jul 03, 2009 at 01:34:45 PM MST

Interesting... was just talking about how to save juice using flash instead of spinning disk... this would be a more than significant improvement on even that idea... :)



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#4)
by DamonHD on Fri Jul 03, 2009 at 02:03:17 PM MST

Well, Linux laptop-mode seems to me to really cut consumption by the disc if you are careful to minimise spurious I/O (eg turning off atime (last-accessed timestamps on files) and verbose logging and so on.

And caching the frequently used stuff on a memory card to reduce the need for disc spinups yet further seems to work.

Basically I hope that getting away from the x86 to ARM will more than halve my consumption with a bit more careful trimming of my main applications, but I'll have to be very careful with the peripherals.

Rgds

Damon

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#9)
by Madscientist267 on Fri Jul 03, 2009 at 08:47:02 PM MST

Sweet, I'm going to have to look into this... Any idea off the top of your head if FreeBSD supports the same hacks? Right now, main systems are running FreeNAS (FreeBSD) as the frontend, and Openfiler (rPath) backends. Workstations running SuSE 10.3 and Mint 6, and they're next target for the power tweaking (still using spinning disk).

All are x86 and could still use some help in that area... but the servers seem the most logical place to start since less power also means less heat means more reliability, and they're not really all that high traffic...

Steve

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#13)
by DamonHD on Sat Jul 04, 2009 at 01:20:21 AM MST

Hi,

I don't, but I see no reason why it couldn't.

One note of caution: laptop HDDs are speced for as much as 10x more spin-down/spin-up cycles as desktop drives AFAIK.  Run laptop mode with the latter and you may kill the drive.

Rgds

Damon

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#5)
by scottsAI on Fri Jul 03, 2009 at 02:22:17 PM MST

Hello Damon,

Looked at using a router?
http://www.dd-wrt.com/dd-wrtv3/index.php

Install Linux, HDD etc.
CPU below 1ghz for the most part, not sure what horse power you need.
Bunch of support for IO.

Much cheaper than a laptop!

Have fun,
Scott.



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#6)
by DamonHD on Fri Jul 03, 2009 at 02:47:58 PM MST

Hi,

Yes, indeed, and ideal would be to piggyback it all onto my ADSL router I think since that is going to be the most power-hungry part when I've done.

But I need (I think) at least 512MB main memory and preferably more, and at least 1GHz CPU when operating at maximum speed.

Rgds

Damon

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#11)
by scottsAI on Fri Jul 03, 2009 at 11:58:31 PM MST

Your needs are outside of what I have seen for routers.
600mhz, few tens of Mb RAM. Many making modes to up those numbers.
Just how crazy do you want to go?

YMMV: Verify the internal power supplies in the ADSL router is a switching supply.
My Router uses 12v input, internal voltage regulator drops it down to 5v, then 3.3v.
Replacing with a switching supply should cut power in half.
Already a switcher, then no gain.

Have fun,
Scott.


[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#15)
by frackers on Sat Jul 04, 2009 at 04:03:46 AM MST

As you will have seen from my various posts and my diaries I'm running a couple of routers - one for the turbine controller and a second one I'm just writing the software for now, an irrigation controller. They draw about 5 watts each but the irrigation box will be mains powered as it controlling the 3kw 3 phase well pump for example so no point in using RE on it.

What I've been amazed by though is the way even standard desktop technology has reduced its power needs.

I'm currently running my UPS, a satellite Set Top Box, my ADSL modem with phone interface for VoIP and my new server box and taking less that 80w for the lot. My last box (6 years old when I replaced it last month) was  bringing the total to over 200w.

Sounds a lot until I tell you that the server is a dual core CPU, 4G of RAM, 5TB of raid5 disk (5 off 1000GB disks spinning!!), a 160GB system drive, two TV cards and the only consession to power usage so far is to clock the CPU cores on demand so they slow down (and run at below 20C) when not much to do.

I'm going to be saving over NZ$200 a year on power bills just by doing an upgrade to a computer that is 10 times faster, has 5 times the storage, 4 times the RAM and graphics that were not even dreamed of 6 years ago!!

Yeah!!
Robin - Down Under (or are you Up Over)
[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#16)
by DamonHD on Sat Jul 04, 2009 at 09:32:12 AM MST

Yeah!!  Indeed.  Of only washing machines would get 10x faster and user 10x less power every few years...  B^>

Rgds

Damon

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#17)
by DamonHD on Sat Jul 04, 2009 at 09:32:37 AM MST

If

[ Parent ]


Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#23)
by scottsAI on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 11:01:14 AM MST

Frackers,

My new computer draws double that power. Dual core 6Ghz, 1Tb HDD. No RAID.
Running SETI, drawing 135w, UPS 24w, Router 5w, not measured cable modems or several switches.
Not running SETI computer uses 86w.

What CPU and motherboard you using?

Have fun,
Scott.

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#27)
by frackers on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 03:56:08 PM MST

I'm running the following (custom build by a local shop to my specs)

ASUS M3N78Pro motherboard (GeForce 8300 onboard graphics)
Corsair PC2-6400 DDR2-800 (4GB total)
AMD Athlon X2 5050e CPU AM2 45W (2.6GHz)
CoolMaster Centurion 590 case with 400w PSU
ASUS DRW-22B1ST DVD writer

  1. GB IDE Seagate 7200.10 system disk
  2. GB SATA2 Seagate 7200.11 x 5
So far it all works, a small problem with unreliable connection via a USB to serial converter to the UPS which caused random shutdowns but I've brought the internal serial port out to the back panel now so that's fixed!!
Robin - Down Under (or are you Up Over)
[ Parent ]


Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#29)
by scottsAI on Mon Jul 06, 2009 at 08:01:24 PM MST

Frackers,

The 45 watt CPU was not out when I was looking.
AMD Athlon X2 5050e CPU AM2 45W (2.6GHz)
Nice CPU, maybe will build a computer with it.
Design and build my own computers, above $320 back in Nov08, all new except case.
Driving factor is cost/performance for SETI, had 22 going for a while.

Scott.

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#7)
by commanda on Fri Jul 03, 2009 at 03:46:42 PM MST

I want one of these.

http://www.mini-box.com/Samsung-S3C2440A-400MHz?sc=8&category=1130

I've also got a Seagate FreeAgent Go 120 Gb external usb hard drive; just a heads up but it doesn't play nice with Linux. Had to kill the auto powewrdown because it wouldn't restart when required. Only works with Windoze apparently.

Amanda



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#8)
by dnix71 on Fri Jul 03, 2009 at 06:52:45 PM MST

Some of those externals don't play well with Mac either. I have a few big externals I have to manaually restart to use after they sleep. LaCie enclosures are usually safe. Those were made to save power, but play well with OSX and Linux.

[ Parent ]


Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#10)
by Madscientist267 on Fri Jul 03, 2009 at 08:52:11 PM MST

Thats cuz mac is based on Linux' grumpy older cousin; BSD... :( It's a pain to work with sometimes because it's picky about certain things, but rock solid in others. Everything has tradeoffs...

[ Parent ]


Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#12)
by DamonHD on Sat Jul 04, 2009 at 01:18:34 AM MST

/usr/ucb/ps -guaxww beats /<sysv>/ps -ef hands down!  B^>

BSD is the Big Swinging ... um ... something of *nix.  But I like Linux too.

Rgds

Damon

[ Parent ]



Low power server (3.00 / 0) (#14)
by independent on Sat Jul 04, 2009 at 01:32:15 AM MST

I ran a low power server for awhile. Was a bx based intel server and a coppermine 600mhz and used less than 60w with a laptop drive.

Put in an order for a new gecko edubook. Thing runs on aa batteries! 8 of them for 4 hours.   I dont know, 2.5w? With a screen. Preproduction models sent out next week. Dont know if i made that list. Norhtec, the outfit making these has some low power servers. I imagine the SOC tech will make ultra low power servers a reality. Probably run slower than molasses but hey beggars cant be choosers.    



Re: Low power server (3.00 / 0) (#18)
by Madscientist267 on Sat Jul 04, 2009 at 01:41:42 PM MST

It is truly amazing how far they have come with all of this... Considering that most (even basic) cell phones have considerably more ability than the first pentium desktop models of only a decade and some change ago, there really is no telling at this point what things will look like in even the next 10 years. We all make jokes about computers on our wrists, but is it really that far fetched? :)


[ Parent ]


Re: Low power server (3.00 / 0) (#19)
by Stonebrain on Sat Jul 04, 2009 at 03:05:47 PM MST

power usage won't be an argument against computers anymore.
don't know about pollution of environment.
but what about pollution of our minds?
I try to to control or to reduce the hold of computers (including phones)on my daily life rather than following blindly the irrational enthusiasm for the overall tendency.
Matter of precaution.

cheers,
stonebrain

[ Parent ]



Re: Low power server (3.00 / 0) (#24)
by Madscientist267 on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 02:37:56 PM MST

Thats one area that I don't allow them to control. My machines work for me, not the other way around. Sure, they take effort to make them do what I want them to do for me, but I don't bow down to them or otherwise distress when they are not operational...

The rest of the world? Well, not so sure. It's been a long debate for a while as to whether the world would be able to survive if someone 'pulled the plug' on the entire internet at once... Nobody knows how to use paper anymore.

Personally I think my wife would flat out croak if the internet died... I love her to death but she's way too dependent on technology.

Steve

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#20)
by zeusmorg on Sat Jul 04, 2009 at 04:56:33 PM MST

 I'd like to find an affordable solution for my VoIP setup. I use a magicjack, which requires XP to be installed. so that would mean an x86 based machine. I'm sure I could pare down the installation size to what was just needed for the application.

 All I've found so far just is more than I'd be willing to spend though.And yes I know there are VoIP solutions that will work on linux, it's just the the magicjack service is extremely cheap and very clear. I've experienced no problems with it. I'm just not willing to build a 250 server just to use my phone. I would like to reduce my power usage, though. Too bad that sheevaplug won't install XP..



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#25)
by Madscientist267 on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 02:45:24 PM MST

Go laptop; you'll at least get some of your power savings, and the benefit of it also still being a computer that can be used for other things. Dedicating a machine is great, and can improve several aspects of a project, but its not worth it to have 30 different 5 watt machines doing all these different tasks if the same work can be done by a single machine that only draws 50.

Always a tradeoff somewhere... :(

Steve

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#30)
by Bruce S on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 12:14:58 PM MST

Z-
No sure you're still following this thread, but..
The Pare down the system, there's a program that can be had for near free and a small device that is pretty cheap to find too.

First: Program, out on the web there is a program called XPlite, just google it, download it and give that a try.
Our company uses it to dump the 100% garbage built in XP, which also makes it safer and harder to hack, before sending the laptops out into the world. Its a stable program, been around for a few years now, if it's what you like it can be purchased, which gives even more abilites plus support.
I don't own stock in this company(wish I did), just know how well it works and have two IBM 380Zs running the 98lite on 64mb CFs which includes a wired PCMICA nic. sitting 3 feet behind me.
The cards were in the trash pile :()

Other item is pretty easy to find for around 12USD, turns the old CF cards in HDs.
Once your XP is pared down to size, use the CF, load your XP onto it and off you go.

THIS is what our company is doing with the older Dell SF desktops that are in our Cafe's for lunch time surfing.

Less heat, no HD to fail and makes ghosting them out 100x easier.

Hope this helps;
Bruce S

 

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#31)
by zeusmorg on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 01:30:40 PM MST

 It's not the XP OS size that's the problem It's finding a low cost low power x86 compatible system that is cheap! I could use my eee but why would i want to tie up a 300 $ machine just to run my Voip? If i could find someting for say 50 that was low power, I'd jump on it.. lowest cost I've gotten so far is around 150, and I'm just not willing to spend that to save 20 a year (if that)

 That would be an atom Mobo CF card, cf to IDE, PS, and no case!

 Right now I'm using an older dell that runs it just fine, It's just the power consumption I'd like to lower.(which i have somewhat i pulled out all unnecessary components, and run w/no monitor on it)

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#32)
by DamonHD on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 02:35:49 PM MST

I believe that the SheevaPlug has already been used at least to stream audio and video, so VoIP shouldn't be a sweat, in theory...

Rgds

Damon

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#33)
by zeusmorg on Mon Jul 13, 2009 at 10:11:40 PM MST

 I looked into that,, unfortunately sheevaplug will not install XP.. and with my voip setup(magicjack) XP is required.

[ Parent ]


Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#39)
by DamonHD on Fri Oct 09, 2009 at 09:46:10 AM MST

Hi,

Did you see the fit-PC?  About 6W consumption and runs XP...

http://www.fit-pc.com/fit-pc1/

Rgds

Damon

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#34)
by Bruce S on Tue Jul 14, 2009 at 06:57:55 AM MST

Ahh; I understand now. The bummer part of the Dell's, is that they don't use standard PS otherwise you could grab a lower rated PS and use it instead.

Bruce S

 

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#21)
by AbyssUnderground on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 06:51:17 AM MST

My Lenovo S10e NetBook runs at around 10.5w with wifi enabled and backlight at step 3 of 10. It also has a mechanical drive, not SSD.

Specs:

  1. 6GHz Intel Atom
  2. GB RAM
  3. GB HD
  4. 4" LED backlit LCD
  5. Wh extended battery (24Wh standard) (~8hr battery life under full cpu load, 3/10 backlight and wifi enabled)
PSU is 19v 2A

Power usage:
Normal use (Wifi enabled, backlight 3/10, browsing internet) - 10.5w
Idle (Wifi enabled, backlight 3/10) - 8.5w
Idle screen off (Wifi enabled) - 7w

I could do more tests but I don't have the time. Needless to say it is a very very low power machine and would be perfect for your projects. It even has that lovely SD card slot which supports the 32gb card you spoke of. Also, it has an expresscard slot for an SSD HDD should you wish to replace the mechanical 80GB drive (I wouldn't, its very low power and contains plenty of space).

At a cost of under £200 its a steal.

http://www.repowered.co.uk - My Renewable Energy site.
msn[at]m3ezw.co.uk - my msn if you want a chat.



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#22)
by DamonHD on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 07:22:17 AM MST

Yes, indeed, the Atom machines do seem to be in the right ballpark, but since it's unlikely that a simple incremental upgrade will recover the embedded energy of a new toy to justify itself that way then I'd be better doing rather more for my input resources.  B^>

I'm hoping that a switch to another well-supported but non-x86 architecture and form factor is big enough of a step-change to help other people do it overcome their worries to try it too, and at ~£100 all-in, it's truly cheap and capable enough for some people to be able to run their Web sites, etc, at home or whatever on a fraction of what co-lo might cost and consume.

So, this is an 'educational' project for me (and anyone who reads my write-ups)!

Having said all that, if Intel continues its good work on x86 energy efficiency then I have no fundamental objection to using a machine like yours.

My target is to have the whole schmole including DSL connectivity on <10W within a year or two, and at least the computing part able to run off my 40Ah 12V off-grid PV system battery for at least 24h.  This is just an experimental step on the way there.

Rgds

Damon

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#26)
by Madscientist267 on Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 02:50:45 PM MST

Yup and thats the thing. Problem with a 'universal' solution is that there really isn't one when it comes to computers...

There are way too many factors unfortunately; cost, performance, energy consumption, use-case, anticipated load, time to tinker with it, knowledge level... the list goes on and on...

Steve


[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#28)
by DamonHD on Mon Jul 06, 2009 at 09:22:13 AM MST

Well, I've been having fun today and think that I've tweaked the main app so that it'll run comfortably within 256MB-ish, down from 1GB minimum, ie less than half of the physical memory.  Mainly took all night thinking (and working on another aspect) and then about 10 lines of code...  Now if only all applications could halve their resource requirements that easily.

Obviously that theory is no substitute for trying it in practice!  B^>

Rgds

Damon



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#35)
by DamonHD on Mon Sep 14, 2009 at 09:16:10 AM MST

Ah ha! Next step towards world domination!

I now have my little SheevaPlug Linux box running from my off-grid solar PV system, and it's drawing a whole 3W. I don't think that it'll draw more than 6W maxed out the way I intend to have it set up. At 5W it could run off my small solar battery (12V, 40Ah) for a couple of days without a ray of sunshine to 50% DoD...

(Note that just about 1W is taken up just running its Ethernet connection.  The ADSL/modem/WiFi takes ~8W from the mains.)

Rgds

Damon



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#36)
by DamonHD on Fri Sep 18, 2009 at 11:32:16 AM MST

It's actually now running the beefiest application that it has to, my Java-based Gallery, that also runs on a 24-CPU box in co-lo and a couple of other servers round the world.

It's still a tad slow though acceptable for my purposes, and various tuning and other services need to go in, but it lives!  And entirely solar powered off-grid, with my meter saying 3.1W.  B^>

Rgds

Damon

PS. Can't remember if I posted my set-up page, apologies if I did: http://www.earth.org.uk/note-on-SheevaPlug-setup.html

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#37)
by DamonHD on Mon Sep 21, 2009 at 11:07:29 AM MST

I've beefed up the SD card to 32GB and I have ordered a 128GB USB flash drive for bulk storage.  Within a week or so I hope to power down my current Linux laptop/server and be using the SheevaPlug instead entirely off-grid.

(The ADSL modem has to remain on-line for the moment, but I'm working on that.)

So basically I need to move my mail and SVN and remaining Web services (and data) across and I should be done.

The biggest problem I have is the DC power from my 5V regulator which seems to be dodgy!

Rgds

Damon

PS. Separately my MPPT solar regulator should help ensure that there is enough solar power in winter...

PPS. This 'sabbatical' thing seems to involve rather less income and rather more spending than might have been hoped!



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#38)
by DamonHD on Thu Oct 01, 2009 at 01:49:31 PM MST

Hurrah!  Got there in the end!  A 3-month project roughly...

I have just moved the last of my services, mail, to my SheevaPlug.

So everything is now off the previous laptop/server and it is powered down.

Services include Web (static and Java-based), DNS, mail, NTP.

(I'm sure that there'll be the odd glitch and I may well use that laptop for other things...)

The battery got as slow as 'yellow' (part-full) status on my solar controller, so I spent a lot of today fixing various software issues to reduce consumption.

Rgds

Damon



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#40)
by DamonHD on Fri Oct 09, 2009 at 10:00:45 AM MST

I'd been down to 'red' for 3 days (hovering at 11.5V) after mid-December levels of (lack of) light, which has probably not done my 2-year-old gel battery any good.

(I had to switch back to mains for a day or so to let the battery recover.)

I added another 12Wp (~10%) to my off-grid panels, switched to a more-efficient DC-to-DC converter, and tuned various parts of the software again to further reduce consumption and 'idle' more when the battery is low.

All in, including the converter, consumption is usually under 4W (difficult to tell exactly given the granularity of my power meter in 100mA increments).

Rgds

Damon

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#41)
by DamonHD on Mon Oct 12, 2009 at 11:58:22 AM MST

My other half is not best pleased about the 60Wp of TopRay solar panels that I bought today from Maplin to supplement my little off-grid system that has been struggling to power my SheevaPlug when we've had a run of cloudy days: basically I want to end every day on the controller's green/full indicator unless we've had a couple of really dreadful days.

I now have a little under 200Wp with about 120Wp facing due south and steeply (~70degrees) inclined to optimise winter collection.  The 120Wp and my MPPT should really cover the below-5W 'quiet' power consumption of the plug.

I did bargain the manager down to their 'offer' price (it's not currently on offer) which is about 1/3rd off the ticket price, so at a little over £3/Wp they are about the cheapest per Wp that I can lay my hands on and I'm happy with other TopRay/Maplin panels that I have.

I expect to put these new panels away in summer when I have lots of other generation and kids romping on the grass given that they are at ground level and contain glass.  And I'll have to move them at least once to mow the grass this week.

I also found evidence of an overheated junction/terminal so I'm probably going to put in some quality rewiring time tomorrow afternoon if possible when I get back from being on a panel discussion where someone has mistaken me for an expert on something!  B^>

Rgds

Damon



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#42)
by TomW on Mon Oct 12, 2009 at 01:01:03 PM MST

HD;

Reality sure bites doesn't it! Between pie in the sky industry ratings and low sun days solar can be downright disappointing. However, when it works it just works which is good.

Tom

Ignarus can exsisto rememdium. Sardus est forever


[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#43)
by DamonHD on Mon Oct 12, 2009 at 01:25:15 PM MST

Well now I've got enough actually facing south I think I should be OK.

Being in a dip and in a leafy suburb doesn't help right now with the trees stubbornly refusing to drop their leaves.  You should see the effect on my roof panels in the morning this month: enough to make you weep even if it is already factored in...

Rgds

Damon

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#44)
by DamonHD on Thu Nov 12, 2009 at 02:22:49 AM MST

Pah!!!

A few very gloomy days and taking the battery right down to 11.4V and no recovery even keeping to switched off for a day or so and I've had to revert to mains power (albeit only 4W!).  I feel dirty.  B^>

Rgds

Damon

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#45)
by DamonHD on Fri Nov 13, 2009 at 09:06:14 AM MST

Finally back into 'green' territory on the Morningstar MPPT display (~12.2V resting) so I'm back on using it for my 3W LED work light at least.

And we're due 80mph (129km/h) winds over the next day, which even in my stupid location should hopefully push the odd Joule in...

Rgds

Damon

[ Parent ]



Re: Ultra-low-power Web server (3.00 / 0) (#46)
by DamonHD on Fri Nov 13, 2009 at 12:40:05 PM MST

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8358530.stm

[ Parent ]


Ultra-low-power Web server | 46 comments (46 topical)
Display: Sort:
Menu
· create account
· How to use the board
· FAQs
· search the board
· Google search the board

Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password:

Total Views
  114 Scoop users have viewed this posting.

Related Links
· http://www .marvell.com/products/embedded_processors/developer/kirkwood/sheevaplug.jsp
· http://gbe nson.net/?p=137
· DamonHD's Diary

Powered by Scoop
You must be a registered user to post here. It's easy and free, and the link is on the upper right side of your page.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Postings are owned by the poster, but may be deleted or moved at the ADMIN's sole discretion. The Rest © 2009 Forcefield.
You can Email the board ADMIN here. PLEASE include the username you signed up with!