The PlaceA 100-acre sheep and goat farm in Southeastern Ohio. Thirty acres are dead-flat hayfields. The remaining 70 acres are fairly steep hills covered with multi floral rose bushes and osage orange trees -- both plants are failed government experiments in "living fences."
The Potential
Wind
The wind moves well through the hayfields except for the summer months. However, the wind truly whistles on the hill tops, which are 200 to 250 feet higher than the surrounding valleys. The hill tops are breezy even in the summer months. I'll talk more about the wind later.
Water
There is a creek/stream/river that meanders year round through the hayfields. The reason I refer to it as a creek/stream/river is because the depth varies from 3 inches to 8 ½ feet. The hills have three year round springs, possibly more. The vegetation is so thick I haven't been able to explore all parts of the hills.
Sun
The sun does shine here; well okay, maybe half the time. It's not as good as say the New Mexico/Arizona area, but not as bad as the Pacific Northwest. We're talking maybe 5 ½ hours/day of sunlight strong enough to generate usable power during the summer -- half that in the winter.
The Goal
To turn this farm into a profitable enterprise, the hills have to be converted into pastures. Livestock (namely goat, sheep and pigs) are well able up to the task of clearing the hills, but they'll need water to do it. My end of the job is to provide the fencing and water for the animals, which is about 125 head right now and will be 250 head by this time next year. Eventually, I'll need a water system capable handling up to 750 head for short periods of time and 500 head as the norm.
The average water usage (on my farm) is about one gallon per day per head. A times their consumption rises as high as 2.5 gallons/day/head, and other times as low as 1 quart/day/head -- depending on whether they're eating lush grass or dry hay.
The Idea
I'd like to put a plastic water tank atop the highest hill and let gravity feed several water troughs fitted with float valves. A tank large enough to supply 250 head a gallon/day/head for 90 days (the summer) would be in the 25,000 gallon range. Even assuming I could afford a tank this large, I would not be able to transport it to the top of the hill. A 2,500-gallon tank is more in line with my price range and handling capability.
Creek/River/Stream
To supply 250 gallons of water per day, I'll have to get the water from either the creek/stream/river or the springs or both.
The creek/river/stream certainly has enough water running through it to supply the need. The challenge is raising it up 250 feet to the tank atop the hill. Working out the pounds per square inch (psi) math, I reckon I'll need a pump capable of producing at least 108 psi. Surfing around, I see folks in the pump business talk about "total head" -- or the elevation the pump can push and suck up water. Because atmospheric pressure is a player, even very good pumps are only able to suck up water up 30 feet. Most pumps fall well short of that.
I'm of the opinion that even a cursory cost-benefit analysis would reveal an expenditure for such an excellent device would prove rather prohibitive. In other words, I'd bet anything a pump that stinkin' good would cost me my left nut to buy, operate and maintain.
So moving water from the creek/stream/river will have to be done in stages. I've priced a handful of 12-volt DC pumps (and their AC equivalents) and most are in the $50 to $150 range. The psi ratings are 45 psi (12vdc) to 100 psi (115vac). That means two or three stages where the water is pumped from tank to tank up the hill. I'd rather it be two stages: Fewer pumps, fewer headaches. Since life isn't so gracious, I'll calculate for both and expect the worst.
The Springs & Ram Pumps
My first brainstorming thoughts about using the springs to fill a tank atop the hill were about hydraulic ram pumps. The stumbling block with these magnificent contraptions is water flow. My research tells me I need a minimum of two gallons/minute to force the impetus valve to operate properly. Sure, I realize there are several factors involved, but after the calculator cools off, the bottomline still is dependent upon flow. Kinectic energy runs a ram pump. No momentum, no pumping. The three springs get up to the needed flow rate in mid-December and may keep it up until mid-April.
I'm in the process of building three ram pumps now. I purchased three brass inline water check valves via eBay -- one 1-inch and two ¾-inch valves. I've turned them into impetus valves by removing the small spring inside and reversing the direction of the water flow. None of the pumps are fully assembled yet. I'm still scrounging up some parts. So naturally, I haven't tested my version of the ram pump, but I will.
From April to December, I live with springs feeding water troughs downhill without the ram pushing a percentage to the tank atop the hill.
Supply Power To The Electric Pumps
The best location for a wind turbine is the worst location for a water pump. So suppose I'll locate the wind turbines atop the hills; place the pumps where they'll perform their best; and work out the power transmission problems. As I'm not an electrical engineer, this won't be a trivial matter for me. I've read enough, often enough, that I'm convinced I don't want to attempt a DC circuit from the wind turbines to the water pumps - a distance that could range from 500 to 2,500 feet. That leaves AC, but will the wild AC from the turbines transmit well? I dunno, so I have yet another research project.
Pump Power Consumption
The 12vdc pump I've been eyeballing has an advertised 1.6 gpm rate. Being a conservative type, I'll assume I'll see 0.8 gpm. To pump 250 gallons/day, the pump will have to run 312.5 minutes or 5.5 hours (rounding conservatively.) The pump is supposed to consume from 3 to 7 amps. Taking the high number, the pump will require 38.5 amp-hours/day. I'll need to run three pumps so now we're up to 115.5 amp-hours/day or, multiplying by 12 volts, 1,386 watt-hours/day. Conservative rounding for inefficiencies in the system brings me to 2 kilowatt-hours/day, maybe more.
The 115vac pump that has my eye is rated for .91 gpm at 100 psi, using .95 amps. Hmm ... that's two stages instead of three, saving me the cost of a pump & a tank. Conservative thinking tells me to use 0.5 gpm so the pumps will run for 500 minutes or 8.5 hours per day. Simplifying the math a bit, that's 8.5 amp-hours/pump/day or 17 amp-hours/day total. Multiplying 17 amp-hours times 115 volts comes to 1,955 watt-hours/day. Factoring in losses for the wire, inverters, etc. ... I'll make my wild-ass guess at 2.75 kilowatt-hours/day.
Okay, to be assured I'll have enough power for this livestock water project, I'm going to want a renewable energy system capable of generating 3 kilowatt-hours of electricity per day in a consistent and reliable way. Is there even that much power to be harvested or am I on a pipe dream?
Random Thoughts About Generating Power
Using all potential sources of energy is the goal, but realistically my ambition, engineering skills and finances limit me to one project at a time. So I plan to start with wind, move on to solar and finish up with hydro (with the exception of the ram pumps.)
Harnessing The Wind
On my hilltops, the wind velocities and frequency breaks down like this:
Speed Frequency
< 5 mph 10 percent
·5 to 10 mph 50 percent
·10 to 15 mph 25 percent
·15 to 20 mph 10 percent
> 20 mph 5 percent
With this data and my goal, I'm inclined to consider harnessing winds in 5 to 15 mph range, start furling at 16 mph and strive to be completely furled in winds 21 mph and faster.
My plan is counter to many respected and experienced folk, but to store the power gained in winds I'll see maybe 30 percent of time will take an expensive array of batteries, yes? That expensive array of batteries will need constant maintenance, yes? That expensive array of batteries will eventually need to be replaced, yes? I cannot see the sense in it, but I'm humble enough and open enough to listen to opposing opinions.
The Theoretical Turbine
Using what I've learned from www.otherpower.com and www.fieldlines.com, I'm confident I can build an 8-foot turbine with maybe 12.5 to 17.5 percent efficiency. Okay, if my math is right I can expect the following:
Watt-Hours Per Day
5 mph 6.25 mph 7.5 mph 11.25 mph 15 mph
Theoretical Power Available 747 1,465 2,520 8,517 20,159
The Betz Limit 442 868 1,493 5,047 11,946
A 17.5% Efficient Turbine 131 256 441 1,491 3,528
A 15% Efficient Turbine 112 220 378 1,278 3,024
A 12.5% Efficient Turbine 93 183 315 1,065 2,520
To meet the power needs of the water system, it seems to me that I'll need to build 7 to 10 turbines. Whew! That's a lot!
Going Bigger
Larger turbines maybe the more logical course of action. Even so, my gut feeling is that I'd be in over my head. Right now, I feel more comfortable manufacturing 8 footers than say 12, 16 or 20 footers. It just feels safer so I believe that's what I'll do.
The Blades
For $20, I bought a 10-foot, 4-inch, schedule 40 PVC pipe. Using the info I've read (and reread several times) about ZubWoofers, I'm about to slice & dice to get a two sets of eight-foot ZubWoofer PVC blades. I'll use the 2-foot scrap to beef up the hub section a tad bit.
Designing A Generator To Match The Blades
I have 24 1-inch x 0.5-inch, N42-grade, neodymium disk magnets. I also have 400 feet of 18-gauge magnet wire. I think I can work up a duel-rotor, 12-pole, 9-coil generator. With 21 feet of wire per coil, I think that works out to 150 - 155 turns. The specs on the N42 was 12,900 guass. Another wild-ass guess gives me 5 tsr or about 125 rpm in 7.5-mph winds. Wired in star, my math tells me I'm 24 plus volts at 13 - 18 amps, depending upon the efficiency of the turbine. Of course, this pig is hypothetical. Once it's built, we'll see what the real world looks like.
Humble
Ladies and gents, trust me when I say this. I have a thick skin so don't stand on ceremony. Let me have it if you feel I'm off base. I short of telling to plug the whole thing into the grid and forget about it, I'll listen.