« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: another pulse charging reference Jan 2008  (Read 825 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

shay

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
another pulse charging reference Jan 2008
« on: January 30, 2008, 05:30:31 PM »
« Last Edit: January 30, 2008, 05:30:31 PM by (unknown) »
Logged

commanda

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 731
Re: another pulse charging reference Jan 2008
« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2008, 04:15:19 PM »
operating procedures should be arranged so that batteries are placed on charge only when 80% discharged;


Really?


Amanda

« Last Edit: January 30, 2008, 04:15:19 PM by commanda »
Logged

bob g

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1107
  • 8.8kwatt idi diesel thermal conversion unit
    • microcogen.info
Re: another pulse charging reference Jan 2008
« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2008, 06:51:05 PM »
ahhhhhhhhhh!!!!!


why not just charge the darn things properly to start with?


bob g

« Last Edit: January 30, 2008, 06:51:05 PM by bob g »
Logged
research and development of a S195 changfa based trigenerator, modified
large frame automotive alternators for high output/high efficiency project X alternator for 24, 48 and higher voltages, and related cogen components.
www.microcogen.info and a SOMRAD member

Chagrin

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 195
Re: another pulse charging reference Jan 2008
« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2008, 08:11:31 PM »
Yeah the entire document is pretty terse. Hard to say if they're referring to the labor aspect, the efficiency of the charge, the need to pulse charge at that level, or if it's just a dumb statement.
« Last Edit: January 30, 2008, 08:11:31 PM by Chagrin »
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »