Interesting design, and always worth experimenting.
In 1979 we built our "family house" experimenting with passive solar heating.
City: Eugene, OR.
Average Winter Temp: 30 - 40 Farenheit. Occasionally teens and twenties.
Average Winter Cloudy Days 90% (well, that was a bit of an issue for us).
Note, the coldest days were often the clearest of days.
Unfortunately, some aspects weren't as efficient as we had hoped. However, the basic design was:
- degree south facing roof... skylights on roof (Total of 7 - 4x8 double panes) + attached greenhouse on one side with all glass greenhouse roof.
- " Solid (relatively dark) brick wall down the middle of the house.
Before building "my house", I'll have to carefully consider the benefits and failures of my parent's house. I think the basic design concept was fine: Solar panels + "absorber"... then moving the "absorber" away from the panels and using the space in the middle as living space.
The greenhouse was behind my parent's bedroom, and their complaint was that the bedroom would actually start getting warmer around 3:00 AM (the time for the absorbed heat to pass through the 12" brick wall). I believe that we had a net gain in energy with the greenhouse and the brick wall behind it, but it would have acted as a 2-way channel, passing house heat to the greenhouse, and solar heat to the house.
Anyway, the greenhouse was great for growing things like cactuses, and as far as I know, it never actually froze inside. I remember one winter day with snow outside, and 90+ degree temperatures in the greenhouse.
One note.
The brick wall is essentially always below 90 degrees. So, no matter what, it will always feel cool to the touch.
So,
Back to the original issue:
I would add to the greenhouse design would be some kind of an absorber...
Assuming we are talking about a permanent structure, consider a dark colored concrete/brick back wall (north side). If it was freestanding, you might insluate the back of the wall. However, in your case, you might want to radiate heat back into the house (or back and forth).
The question I would have is what to do with the floor of the greenhouse. Would the benefit be realized from insulating it from the earth... or perhaps utilizing the earth itself as a heat sink.
With the idea of using the floor as a heat sink, you might have nearly equal performance by painting the floor black, or just make sure it is dark (at least in the winter), and using it as a natural heat sink. The goal might be a lower "spike" in the daylight, but maintaining a higher average temperature difference.