This is not really my field but as I see it the angle used in blade calculators is the line joining the leading edge to trailing edge of the aerofoil. No decent aerofoils have a truely flat drive face, but many have a form that is flat from the trailing edge up to about 30%. Beyond that there is a slight curvature ( perhaps up to 4% of maximum thickness. If you make them flat they work well enough and that is how most make wooden blades.
With sections cut from pipe the characteristics will be so totally different that the line from leading edge to trailing edge will no longer be useful for the angles predicted by calculators.
I suspect that TDM's and small iron cored alternators have a lot of iron loss drag and need lower tsr and higher torque to turn in low winds.
If you scale Dan's type blades and scale all dimensions it will scale with the same tsr. If someone has tried it and it doesn't work then it is almost certainly because you need a tsr lower than 6 or 7, not because the blade is wrong.
Even with dual rotors with no iron loss, the bearing drag is more of an issue with small blades and tsr of about 5 will give better results. Hugh's 4 ft wooden bladed rotor works very well with the dual rotor machines but for draggy, lossy iron cored machines you may be better off going as low as tsr4 for results in low winds.
To make higher tsr blades from pipe you will likely need zero angle or negative at the tip, based on the line joining leading to trailing edge and nothing from a calculator is going to be much of a guide.
Flux