When the blade is static, the amount of starting torque is a function of the integral of the surface area and the angle of that surface area to the incident wind.
Whether that surface are is spread across one or a hundred blades, it does not make a huge difference.
A two bladed prop is hard to balance, as the blades tend to teeter a bit when they pass in front of the tower at the bottom of their path, and this creates a relative imbalance on forces on the blade and a resultant vibration. This is less noticible with more blades, although generally an odd number of blades is recommended.
The more blades that you have in an ideal turbine, the thinner the blades will be in the direction of the wind. The thinner something is the harder it is to make it as structurally sturdy in that axis.
Based on the above, and the fact that I cannot effectively balance a one blade prop, and even if I do, I have a large inertial weight hanging opposite to it that is not doing anything productive, that leaves me with a three bladed prop as the optimum.
This represents my current thinking on the subject, others may differ. Rich Hagen