Southpaw,
"The blades would have to be designed as propellers and as such would have no value as wind driven blades on a turbine."
You're absolutely right, of course. I didn't mean to imply that one could simply take a wind turbine rotor, as it is, and run it like a propellor. The blade angle needs to be reversed and the twist (if any) also needs to be reversed. I did mention the reciprocity thing.
The idea is to be able to use a practical testing protocol to evaluate the various rotor/blade parameters, such as solidity, number of blades, airfoil, aspect ratio, twist and taper. In other words, a research tool.
As a point aside, blade twist and taper is highly over-rated as a necessity to an efficient rotor. It only buys a few percent. I have a constant chord, zero twist rotor with a Cp of 0.42, although it is meant for variable pitch. The airfoil has a much larger effect.
Thanks for bringing this to everyone's attention.