Ok....
So, I pulled up my copy of NFPA 70A / NEC (2002)
Here is what I gleaned in a few minutes.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Section: 250.162A
(A) Two-Wire, Direct-Current Systems. A 2-wire, dc system supplying premisis wiring and operating at greater than 50 volts but not reater than 300 volts shall be grounded.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Section 210.10 Ungrounded Conductors Tapped from
Grounded Systems.
Two-wire dc circuits and ac circuits of two or more ungrounded
conductors shall be permitted to be tapped from
the ungrounded conductors of circuits that have a grounded
neutral conductor. Switching devices in each tapped circuit
shall have a pole in each ungrounded conductor. All poles of
multipole switching devices shall manually switch together
where such switching devices also serve as a disconnecting
means as required by the following:
(1) 410.48 for double-pole switched lampholders
(2) 410.54(B) for electric-discharge lamp auxiliary equipment
switching devices
(3) 422.31(B) for an appliance
(4) 424.20 for a fixed electric space-heating unit
(5) 426.5 1 for electric deicing and snow-melting equipment
(6) 430.85 for a motor controller
(7) 430.103 for a motor
----------------------------------------------------------------
Section 690 (1 through 80) deals specifically with the solar systems, and pretty much just says the same thing (lots of redundancy in the code).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, things seem to be different for > 50VDC...., and according to 690.71.E(2)
690.71E Battery Systems of more than 48 Volts
(2) The DC and AC Load Circuits shall be solidly grounded.
------------------------------------------------------------------
So... it is recommending Grounding the negative pole of the battery, but one can leave a 110v derivative circuit ungrounded (I think). However, if the 110V system is ungrounded, all light swiches must be bipolar.
A 12V DC Only circuit may be ungrounded as long as it doesn't have an inverter.
There is more on the GFCI's and Arc Fault stuff.
OOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
I found some stuff on NEC 2005. Note, my references and quotes to 2005 codes are secondary references, and not relating to a primary source evaluation.
They've added a new section: 690.35, recognizing Ungrounded systems, but I am a little confused as to where it applies...
There is an interesting note about "Safety" (I think).
690.35.4. Because many people think that ungrounded PV systems
are inherently safer than grounded systems, a warning
label will be required at all points where the ungrounded
conductors are terminated. Labels with the following
warning
Warning: Electric Shock Hazard. The direct current
circuit conductors of this photovoltaic power system are
ungrounded, but may be energized with respect to ground
due to leakage paths and/or ground faults
will have to be attached by the installer at points where the conductors
are attached to terminals that may require service, like
junction boxes and disconnects
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
However, Section 690.47 further clarifies the grounding:
Section 690.47(C) clarifies the requirements for grounding
systems that have both AC and DC grounding requirements.
Typically, all systems with inverters must have both the AC
and the DC sides of the system grounded since the internal
transformer in the inverter isolates the DC grounded
conductor from the AC grounded conductor. The code
allows the DC grounding electrode conductor to be routed
to one of two locations:
1. To a DC grounding electrode, which then must be bonded
to the AC grounding electrode, or
2. Directly to the AC grounding electrode, where it is
connected to that electrode with a separate clamp.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
REF:
Code Corner by John Wiles (with some new NEC 2005 notes)
http://www.sandia.gov/pv/docs/PDF/CodeCorner105.pdf
http://www.nmsu.edu/Research/tdi/public_html/pdf-resources/IAEI-3to4-05.pdf
System Design and Workshop Notes:
http://www.energy.ca.gov/renewables/notices/2005-10-24_PV_WORKSHOP.PDF
Ok...
So, reading a bit more....
The Transformer, by design, provides the circuit isolation between the 12V and 110V. Thus, the 12V negative and 110V positive CAN be tied together on the same ground (if one has a transformer). One can have a non-transformer circuit where one needs to keep the two isolated.
Thus, I think my problem wasn't the lack of a center tapped transformer, but rather the presence of a center tapped transformer.
- V... Tie one leg to ground, DON'T NEED "center tapped transformer", but must have an inverter designed for this.
- V... Tie "neutral" to ground, NEEDS "center tapped transformer"
OK.
Wow... I think I've come into a complete circle in my thoughts.
With a "cheap inverter" as one might use to connect to an auto battery, one must have the circuit isolated from the case (to avoid accidental shocking by touching the case). Thus, the two hot legs are isolated from ground, and the transformer would be "center tapped" to ground. A more expensive 110 inverter would be built anticipating a built-in installation where the "white leg" is tied to ground, and at 110V, would NOT be "center tapped" (I think). But, a 220V tranformer/circuit, on the other hand, ties the center leg to the ground, and thus uses the center tapped transformer.
I guess I am rambling, but there is a lot of good stuff to read.
----- Clifford -----