with a turbine there are more than 2 forces at work though while a single row 3 point contact slewing bearing as I drew would work in theory since it can withstand thrust and radial to an extent Moment as well however this severely limits the speed at which it can rotate continuously.
To have speed we must have a couple more factors clearances being one of these
. if the bearing is made with too much then it cannot hold true rotational direction it would either wobble or vibrate causing still more problems one of these would be impact loading
The best way to reduce this would be what is called preload for a 2 point contact preload is easy to accomplish.
not so with a 4 point contact since this causes friction and wear
so the way around this most use taper roller bearings facing opposite of each other now radial , thrust and moment are reasonably controlled . But there is a problem tapered bearings of large internal and external diameters are also very thick and heavy
There are ultra slim tapered bearings and they are 100 times the price of a much smaller set of bearings which would have the design capacity for the turbine to run on
Angular contact ball bearings share many of the same design qualities of taper bearings it takes 2.
Ford and Nash were among the last car makers to switch from angular contact ball bearings to taper roller bearings in the front wheels
So this brings us to thrust ball bearings it takes 2 to control thrust and moment but they do not do well with radial
What we need is a bearing that exhibits the capacity to handle thrust both positive and negative angular moments and radial loads all at the same time
we could either just use 2 angular contact bearings or 3 thrust bearings plus a radial bearing or 2 taper roller bearings Or the one single row slew bearing similar to what I have previously posted and be satisfied. All of these have their merits and short comings
In the contemplated design the designer has shown that he wishes to have a large internal diameter he has his reasons for this.
The complicated and tedious machining to make ultra slim taper roller bearings and the fact that 2 would be required NIX's this one
The need for 3 bearings 2+1 for thrust & radial NIX's this one
leaving angular contact meaning 2 NIX!
or the slew bearing, Viable but with issues.
It seams we are out of options or one might think they were.
Never fear back in 1947 a company in Sweden used to build radial arm drill presses in their Quill there was a single bearing that could handle thrust in 2 directions and radial loads. I know this because I used to own one of those drill presses the problem was the 50 year old quill bearing finally failed and I could not find a replacement so I did what any Texas redneck would do I machined out the Quill and installed 2 thrust and a radial bearing in its place.
When what I should have done was to machine a new bearing housing and buy replacement balls
the drawing below is a rendition in much larger form of that bearing

it consists of a single outer race which could be press fit into a housing or machined large enough to be drilled for mounting bolts. 3 rows of balls 2 will take thrust and some radial plus handle any angular moment loading the center row of smaller balls would take care of any radial loading. due to the contact angles no ball receives more than a 2 point contact friction and wear is greatly reduced allowing for higher RPMs