Logged in users > User Diaries
Orientation of sphere magnet inside sphere magnet
magnO:
I can also mention that when working on ideas that have not yet become the dominant paradigm, you get disproportionally much negative response. Galileo was prosecuted by the church a few times if I recall, set free every time, but still a lot of extra work.
Apollo 12 crashed the empty ascent stage of its Lunar Model on the lunar surface, an event that Werner von Brauhn for example wrote about in this article from March 1970. The seismographs that had been placed on the surface measured seismic waves from the impact, and "the moon rang like a bell for nearly an hour". That is all documented.
I grew up with plate tectonics and the fixed radius model, as in, during childhood, when biologically you are more prone to trust ideas without actual scrutiny, I was told the radius had been fixed and that only the Atlantic Ocean closes shut while the Pacific Ocean surrounded "Pangea". Then at age 27 in 2014 I came across the idea that the Earth radius has increased. The two models, plate tectonics and expansion tectonics, differ only on a single parameter. I am quite capable of being data-driven and actually lean towards being sceptical in many ways. I love natural science, and I'm just a person, like anyone else. Professionally I design game theoretical coordination systems, those require at least some capacity to think about and design rational systems.
There is an abundance of evidence for radial increase, and, there has been an abundance of evidence for a long time. I am very open to civil debate, but, ad hominems are not civil. They are a fallacy, in this case to defend a status quo within a group, in-group bias.
To find common ground, the radial increase requires the volume to increase with the cube of the radius. That mass increase is seen as a problem, "where does the new mass come from". I believe that the mass has been pushed outwards, solving the mass-increase problem with that there has not been a mass increase. That fits with the data from Apollo 12, and, with seismic data in general, the "shadow zones" (a concept in seismology) are from energy loss with distance, silent at 104°, then convergence at antipode from epicentre, reverberating 40° outwards in all directions, 180-40 =140° (visual illustration).
magnO:
So for what it is worth, fixed radius model is the crackpot model, the model that suspends disbelief, the model that is not open to rational inquiry but has to be defended with superstition, logical fallacies and violence, deterrents, moderation. There is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions, so I am not looking to be rude, or spam, it is in my self-interest to be transparent, polite, and to gather knowledge about the scientific consensus on the question I ask.
Could anyone say what this is showing? https://imgur.com/hcEG61t
Bruce S:
magnO
My questions posted way back in reply #27 remain unanswered . My observations of a hollow magnet will also remain the same, until physical proof is posted.
I will continue reading as a replying observer, and moderator for now.
However please try to understand
Since this is a world-wide viewed forum, people do come and post little gems that are in fact meant as humor. Some translations may not be as exact as one would hope.
We're not purely into science , we like humor. We're also not stuck to tunnel visioned ideas. As I stated before we tend to try to play nice, even sometimes too much causing the original posted questions to get lost . We are humans spanning nearly every country and intelligence levels on this big blue marble.
When someone tries to interject humor into a deep science based question , it's hardly ever meant to be sarcastic, just trying to keep things on the lighter side of life.
This is post remains an interesting one, try not to think we're trying to negative when someone posts SciFi-based humor; especially since some of the items that started out as SciFi are now science based items: satellites, carbon nanotubes, even the Star-trek transporter , just to name a few.
IF however you are looking for pure science based answers without deviations, then perhaps you're posting in the wrong forum.
Bruce S
magnO:
Good that you account for neglected responses, I am looking to value all replies.
--- Quote from: Bruce S on May 08, 2019, 04:14:44 PM ---Relevant to the OP's question.
Are the Sphere's solid or hollow?
--- End quote ---
outer sphere hollow, inner sphere irrelevant. That was answered in reply #40.
--- Quote from: Bruce S on May 08, 2019, 04:14:44 PM ---IF we have the inner mag as hollow, same thing, it's merely going to find outer mag's opposite poles and stick there.
--- End quote ---
Yes like poles repel opposites attract. The question was whether poles were reverse on inside. It seems, from answers, that they are. The answer that so far diverges from others around that was from Joestue, or, his answer seems to show, as seems to be consensus, opposite poles on inside, yet, magnets preferring to orient themselves with opposite polarity (polarity on outside diameter as reference frame), https://imgur.com/hcEG61t.
magnO:
--- Quote from: Bruce S on May 13, 2019, 11:38:51 AM ---We're not purely into science , we like humor. We're also not stuck to tunnel visioned ideas. [...] We are humans spanning nearly every country and intelligence levels on this big blue marble.
--- End quote ---
Yes I am also human, from same marble, also like humour. When humour is one-sided and directed towards a person, that is not sarcastic, it is actually just ad hominem, or insult. To keep level playing ground where there can be humour, moderation always tends to in-group bias, never neutral. As for scifi-based humour, the comment you refer to was not referring to scifi, so that would be a lie, double-think. I am polite, transparent, and like humour, art, music, whatever. Question was simple, have gotten great answers, one diverged a bit, the last one from Joestue, interested in a bit more context to it to get a deepened understanding, https://imgur.com/hcEG61t
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version