Logged in users > User Diaries

Poll: Make User Diaries visible to all users?

(1/4) > >>

SparWeb:
Currently, the User Diaries sub-forum is visible only to Fieldlines members when they are logged in.
Do you prefer the User Diaries sub-forum this way; only visible to Fieldlines members, or would you like it to be visible to all visitors of Fieldlines?

The question came up in a discussion between some of the administrators of the site, and whether there's any benefit to keeping some discussions among the members only.  If there's a strong feeling that way, we'd respect it.  But I figured it would be worth asking to judge how many regular users care.  I have asked the same question of the Pub sub-forum, which is also currently only visible to members when they're logged in.  Maybe there's a different answer for each one - we can deal with that and open one and not the other, if that's the prevailing opinion.

Flavio93Zena:
I'll quote a bit of summary:

--- Quote ---Pros:

* Much better SEO
* More people could join
* More ads revenue
* More trafficCons:

* People could see a bit off-topic stuff and join for that instead of alternative power. Still, more users.
* Some people could throw a fit about making the board public for privacy reasons? Don't think so to be honest but it's an idea, even though I can't see any personal informations or something that would absolutely need to be private (it's a public board upon registration anyway).
--- End quote ---

MagnetJuice:
I can access User Diaries when I am not logged in.

Im I the only one?

Ed

Scruff:

--- Quote from: MagnetJuice on February 12, 2021, 09:36:27 PM ---I can access User Diaries when I am not logged in.

Im I the only one?


--- End quote ---

Nope

Flavio93Zena:
It's specifically The Pub by the looks of it, there was some kind of inconsistency with permissions that was making it visible and didn't notice (mainly board and section settings). Sorry for the confusion, it's just The Pub section.
Site News and Diaries are visible.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version