I wonder about this as well, it's probably a case of using terminology in different ways.
No normal HAWT uses drag. I have seen it claimed that the vane anemometers with flat vanes at 45 deg or more are drag devices. Certainly when TSR falls below 1 then there is not a lot of reason to look at it from the lift point of view.
I am sure a true drag machine has to be something like a Savonious or a cup anemometer where the blade is pressure driven but with the vane anemometer it is probably more the vector component of thrust on the vane that is turning it than lift in the normal sense. It will still have a lift component and a very high drag one.
I am not sure where the wind pump fits into this , with its curved vanes it is most likely more driven by lift, but the early wooden slatted ones were much more like the vane anemometer.
Anyway for all normal HAWTs whether with curved sheet vanes or aerofoil sections they are lift machines. Yes I do agree that normally the plank is a very poor lift machine if set at low angles. If you set the angle of attack high enough to stall then it may be different. In fact this may be the point where these vane anemometers are considered drag , it may be more related to vane angle than anything else.
Flux