Hi Peter,
I'm not sure that Hannu is trying to wax lyrical, I quite enjoy his posts, but I don't know if it is a product of my bi-focals splitting the page in two, or what it is, I just find that I expend too much energy reading the post, than getting the gist of it first time. I always have to read it at least twice. and yes it is always worth reading.
However, the weight of public opinion is against me in this and so on the basis of 2:1, I lose.
It is devlishly cunning how he has mastered the margins thou don't you think?
"As far as content goes; often TomW and RonB (wdyasq) have a point. One or two times they were right when I was not. It's just that the way they express themselves, they spend more time explaining why they wrote something than on the actual issue at hand."......sometimes this is more interesting than the issue at hand.....
"Then again, every now and then, after the n-th time of seeing the same stupid question re-appearing, I find it increasingly more difficult to restrain myself.".........yes, but the person asking didn't think so. If we just let it alone, someone without your board experience will see it as a chance to enlighten someone else for a first time,so its all relative.... and at least they will be happy:).
Ditto with the delete key....and sometimes wish I had hit it earlier.
Trizz and Anthony need to take their tablets more regularly..... best left to admin. It is ultimately up to us who's posts we then read, who's we look forward too, and which ones to skip.
Admin has done a fine effort of maintaining the integrity of this board, ( although I have managed to slip through the cracks and get on:)).
................oztules