They will both furl.
The only issue with which way they furl with respect to their rotation occurs if they're close enough to the tower and the blade flex or bearing slop that gyroscopic forces might make the blade hit the tower.
If I've got this right: The problem is greater during furling than unfurling. During furling the wind is already strong and the blade is spinning fast, creating strong gyroscopic forces. Then the wind gusts even higher, the tail pops up and stops opposing the drag on the off-center blades, resulting in an abriupt yaw. During unfurling the blades will have slowed down, reducing gyroscopic forces, while the tail's ability to yaw the blades back into the wind is limited by the same tilted bearing AND is opposed by the drag on the blades. So unfurling yaw will be slower.
So you want the gyroscopic forces from the furling yaw to push the blades AWAY from the tower, and are willing to accept the slower unfurling yaw to push them toward it (because it's to a lesser extent and under less extreme conditions).
Gyroscopic forces occur because a force trying to turn the axis of a rotating object acts with the sine of its position. So it speeds up over part of a cycle, and by the time it's moving maximally it's a quarter-turn around from the maximum accelleration. Then it decellerates over the next quarter-turn. So the motion from the force is shifted a quarter-turn with the rotation.
You say your machine is rotating clockwise as you face it from windward, and the alternator is offset to the left in the same view. That means in a yaw the blade at 3:00 will be pushed toward you (away from the tower), and thus gyroscopic forces will push it away from the tower at the 6:00 position: Just what you want. Dan's machine, on the other hand, will have the blades pushed toward the tower.
Of course if your blades and bearings are stiff enough and/or your blades are far enough forward from the tower, it's not an issue. If it becomes an issue, it will be less of an issue for you than for Dan.
