Few days agoo fired with a havy gun to Ron.
I feel sorry about that Ron,hope you don't feel too offended.
I've sometimes a peculiar sense of humour.
Can't imagine the board without wdyasc.
Maybe I was a bit on my nervs,I felt a bit disapointed by not having any comment on my story,http://www.fieldlines.com/story/2008/12/2/222156/474,some time ago.
This story is about a working vawt.Thought that was quit a curiousity.
Why didn't Ron point out the sandia report with the proof that it was tried allready and that it doesn't work.
Why not any interest?
The answer is that's because no electricity is involved.It's too simple.
If it was an alternator with a battery and a dc motor I certainly would have had hundreds of replies.
This is a site of electricity junkies!!!Or is infiltrated by the electricitylobby
If you look at the financial/work/environmental costs the electrical equivalent of my realisation isn't competing,and not very sturdy(some costly elements that can fail)
What I'm interested in(among other things) is the direct drive possibilities of vawts(wateroxigenetion,waterpumping etc).
Feel quite alone over here.
if you don't want me,ok.
But at least shoot at me.
cheers,
stonebrain
Diary material
