The super or ultra capacitors (EDLC) made by Maxwell, Tavmirina, Ness and others are able to discharge and charge much more rapidly than batteries. They are finding uses in vehicle power trains for this reason, they are better for accelerating a car quickly and at recapturing the huge inrush of current from regenerative breaking. They are essentially always used in conjuntion with batteries as while the power to weight ratio (ability to discharge a given amount of current all be it for a short time) is better than batteries, the overall energy density is currently much less than batteries. ECASS of Japan has plans to build a primary power system for vehicles using capacitors, however it is quite a ways off in the future by my best guess. Capacitors have improved their energy density by orders of magnitude over the years, and if they can push that envelope another order of magnitude, then they will have distinct advantages to batteries in life expectancy and efficiency of charging and discharging. Leaving a typical carbon based ultra-capacitor at a 0% state of charge will not damage it. Unlike batteries, which rely on a chemical reaction that takes a specific amount of voltage to initiate, and hence are relatively flat in voltage as they charge and discharge, capacitors increase in voltage as they charge. The equation for the amount of energy stored in a capacitor is 1/2C*V^2 where C is the capacitance in Farads, and V is the voltage across the capacitor. Because the stored energy is related to the square of the voltage, if you discharge a capacitor down to 75% of its fully charged voltage, you are discharging 1/2 of its stored energy. This means that you either have to have circuits that can tolerate a more significant voltage change than would occur with a chemical battery, or you would have to significantly oversize your circuits. I believe it is likely possible that the energy storage density of ultra capacitors can increase to be near that of lead acid batteries in the future with the use of better electrolytes and improvements to the microstructure of the electrodes. With lifetimes of over a hundred thousand charge and discharge cycles, I think they will become viable primary power sources for applications such as remote power, utitlity substation back up power, and eventually vehicle power trains. All of this is still off in the future however, and for now, storage batteries are a better option for remote power, as it would take a fortune in money and a tractor trailer full of capacitors to power your home at present. For now they will see ever increasing use in burst power type applications at which they excell relative to battery technologies. Rich Hagen