Sorry Finnsawher,I didn't mean to offend you.Not all
scientifics that do statements without foundation try to manipulate the people.
Sometimes they just don't have the ability to criticise a statement that seems
so confortable.
So,you are a scientific?So am I but I guess we didn't go to the same university,lol.
If you want to know where the co2 went,why not in the giant stock fossil combustibles that has been accumulated in millions of years?
Well I recognise this theory is very unpleasant,because this would mean that if we burn
all of it,we just won't be able to live on this planet anymore.Ugly theory,better stay to the theory that co2 dissapear somewhere.Only I didn't see a plausible explication,where it actually goes.
I don't believe something only because the one who is saying it call himself 'scientist'.I want facts,with a description of the chemical process involved.
you're saying
'Volcanoes, however, continued to spew out CO2, much as they do today.'
and
' It is truly fortunate that the Earth has contained and still contains a vast amount of calcium that is not bonded with carbon.'
Well,in the second statement you say 'fortunate'
Why did you forget to say 'unfortunate' in the first statement?
cheers
Stonebrain