Author Topic: 3 phase rectification confussing  (Read 1181 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

windcruiser

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
3 phase rectification confussing
« on: May 11, 2005, 06:58:50 AM »
I am confused about 3 phase rectification as explained in windstuffnow website http://www.windstuffnow.com/main/3_phase_basics.htm Using 2 bdridge rectifiers isnt there a rist of omly using 2/3 of the total power and entirely losing one phase. The phase seemingly hunging has no return since the second rectifier AC leg is not connected. Please enlighten


Simon

« Last Edit: May 11, 2005, 06:58:50 AM by (unknown) »

drdongle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
Re: 3 phase rectification confussing
« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2005, 04:59:36 AM »
The illustration is correct the lower right connection is not used. to see it illustrated look at the left hand schematic, and imagine a forth set of diodes connected like the others but with out a center connection, it simply is unused, and redundant.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2005, 04:59:36 AM by (unknown) »

kitno455

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 442
Re: 3 phase rectification confussing
« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2005, 08:08:34 AM »
my understanding: a rectifier is just a one-way valve for electrons. the only thing that matters is the potential difference between the input and one of the outputs being greater than two diode drops. that potential difference is maintained by the fact that the pos and neg leads are connected to your load. that is your 'return'.


allan

« Last Edit: May 11, 2005, 08:08:34 AM by (unknown) »

electrondady1

  • SuperHero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3120
  • Country: ca
Re: 3 phase rectification confussing
« Reply #3 on: May 11, 2005, 10:00:17 AM »
i may be mistaken , but i recall a diagram from danb in which three full wave bridge rectifiers were used, one for each of the 3phase leads. each of the leads were connected to both ac terminals.the idea was that all the diodes were equaly loaded.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2005, 10:00:17 AM by (unknown) »