Solar and wind complement each other. Solar gives you power when the weather is good, wind when the weather is bad. Having both means you have power input on most days.
Wind power tends to be proportional to HVAC requirements, because higher wind speeds increase the heat gain or loss through the insulation and air leakage. Very handy (even if the power from the mill is only running incidental HVAC loads like a furnace blower, rather than a giant mill powering electric heat or a heat pump).
50 miles west of Chicago? Doesn't that put you near where the Siberian Express interacts with Gulf of Mexico moist air in the winter, burying you in snow? Maybe not as bad as Minneapolis / St Paul. But I recall when my parents were living out that way the snow tended to cover everything, repeatedly, for much of the year. That, along with the associated cloud cover, would seem to bode ill for getting through a winter on solar panels alone.
Wind may be variable, but when it's there it has a LOT of power. At 3/4 kW / HP it doesn't take a lot of mill to collect a substantial amount of power. (The main problem is to keep it from coming apart or burning out when the wind gets really howling, with power being proportional to the CUBE of the wind speed.)
Between the prevailing westerlies coming off the great plains and the "lake effect winds" generated by the great lakes (read: Inland seas) working off the great plains as a solar collector, they don't call Chicago "The Windy City" for nothing. But the area around and among the Great Lakes is the cloudiest in the central 48 states. When NASA was making a map of the US using satellite imagery with the sun at a constant near-noon angle and no clouds on the ground, they got most of the 48 imaged within a couple weeks - but Michigan took most of the year. As I recall Southeastern Illinois also participates in that issue.
So if I had the time, materials, and such a site, I'd build the mill even if I got a great deal on panels.