(Attachment Link)
Large turbines are often radial, and for me this was a study how I could shape the mechanical components of a radial generator.
To me it seems best now to continu with the mechanical components of axial.
I shall save you some headache right here and now lol
It appears that you have radials down quite nicely. Although, I would have went the segmented stator core route myself for a radial.
BUt, every single dissertation, thesis, any kind of accomplished study of axials clearly states that axials was actually the very first magnetic machine
devised around 1890s. But, real develpment has not begun until about the 1980s. Why is this? Due to the complexity of the topology. I myself have greatly considered
switching to radials because the magnet rotors would be soooo much easier to manage with accuracy. BTW, the real craze seems to be with multi layer overlapping concetrated stator coils
for the power density. And, with very long narrow trapazoid magnets. And, just having one coil not perfectly formed, means 15 percent power loss immediately.
Plus knocking due to the flux not cutting the coils at 180 degrees. Soldering the coils toghether seem to really scew up the accuracy. The only thing I can devise so far is a mould to pre pour them.
But, ive devised my own technique to pot them individually, and press them all to exact dimensions. But, you can easily double or tripple your number of coils by using overlapping coils. But, that means uptruned ends. Ive devised a method to perfectly bend them also.
I also agree, you are so close with the radials. But, looking at one of your earlier pics, it appears that I can see the fibers of your carpet? That is some massive fibers or a really small radial?
Hard to tell scale sometimes. Oh well, back to the drawing board I go lol.
