Are you just looking for the DOD that you can get away with for repeated cycling without killing the cells? I can go sniffing around and see what I can come up with.
Highest amount of kWh and lowest rate of usage deterioration per € Sparweb.
Alongside practical applications.
To be honest what I'm really looking for is the truth. Are they really any better than 170 year old proven technology when you filter out all the associated BS.
I'm glad I didn't buy an off the shelf/proprietary BMS. It'd be much harder to compensate for the issues I'm finding. Penny to a pound the BMS writers are just ignoring the problems. 2k cycles is an awful lot. But I can't help myself and demand does that make it ok to throw away another 2k because it makes things inconvenient to utilise them?
Most of the hardware I test is compromised either intentionally or otherwise...not good enough.
All very interesting stuff - If/when i go for an EV (when i can afford one) I'll want to understand the batteries and how to keep them going.
Life would be easier with an alternative li-ion flavour like NMC, LMO...more volatile though.
I was reading the battery kinder garden site yesterday looking for that elusive incriminating graph that doesn't exist. They claim phone and laptop batteries are "less industrial" hence the 600 cycles...what a loada horse manure....they're being overcharged it's the same flippin' chemistry. It's better outtov the box performance to overclock them and you sell more phones when you build in a predictable 2-year failure mode, ask why they're not replaceable if this isn't a factor?
20% larger cell, with a 20% lower discharge envelope lasts about 4 times longer and costs a coupla grams.
I know lead-
You'd think they'd be a no-brainer.
All you have to do is "over"-charge them to 1.28 SG once per month, add water as required and they become immortal.
For flooded that means 2.47V per cell + 5mV per cell per degree below 25°C to a tail current of 40mA.
Now why is that so hard to do?
People complain about the maintenance..effin' automate it the dopes!
I think I'll SG performance test some chargers I have, to demonstrate the charger manufacturers, are accountable for the bad rep. lead gets. Incidentally, the same ones pushing li-ion for better profit margins. The issue could be resolved much more inexpensively with a lead LVD/HVD BMS and a high fidelity charger.
I have a blue one...I already know that's dire. I fitted it and removed it two weeks later.
I expect that when i eventually have to replace my AGM's I should stick with lead (never really saw the point of Li for stationary applications anyway).
As far as I can tell it's all based on lies & propaganda. Hard to blame anyone because it's compounded, things are taken as fact if it's broadcast enough. For instance somebody show me a factory fresh lead-acid battery that is <90%RTE, pretty please with sugar on top, because most institutes claim 80% and I cannot demonstrate this in normal operation, it's a once a month maintenance cycle co-efficient
only.