<cite>"Why/How would I have access to anything?? I'm just a poster who gets tired of silly rants and nonsensical arguments posted by anonymous users to stir it up."</cite>
Again you don't comprehend? There are more "silly rants" made by logged in people than Anony Hero, very few are made by Anony Hero. Do you know how to use to board or should we post them all in a list? Will you continue to make an argument you can not back up? Because you know we can back up ours.
You have made postings accusing people "with different personalities" of answering their own posts, such an accusation could only be made if you had the IP numbers to back it up.
We all know you would not throw fasle, no proof, accusations at topics you did like, don't we? I mean if you did that it would discredit you as having a valid reason to be here. How can "two different" personalities be the same person "Brian"? Surely you have proof?, since you are preaching "proof"
Why to you make such claims with the same confidence as Tom, using almost the exact same words as Tom? We are all starting to see the "same personallity" backing up it's Anit-Anony Hero goal, using Logged In Names. Should I post all your accusations in a list for comparison?
<cite>"How do I fit into the whole "conpiracy against Johnny" thing you have going on? If someone questions your sometimes silly theories, you automatically think they have it out for you."</cite>
If there is a "conpiracy" it is against Anony Hero. Johnny just happens to be in the way, defending the Anony Hero feature. So then all of your Logged in names with the same personality claiming not to be qualified shrinks, accused "johnny" of being insane, almost in the exact same words, at the same time.
Johnny was the Bait. The "compiracy" we're talking about is the new 1 and 2 posts names screaming "Anony Hero has to go" and Tom quick on the reply. "I know but the Owner wont, bla bla"
If you are in conflict with the owner's wishes to maintain the Anony Hero Feature you should leave. Anony Hero was here when you came, if you don't like it, (You) leave.
<cite>"I don't, but science sure does. People would take you a lot more seriously if you would PROVE your claims. Back them up with the numbers!! Until then they are only theories, not fact.</cite>
Quit changing the subject (same pattern with all your names) then you accuse Johnny of having the names.
And this is not about science theory. This is about your campaign against Anony Hero, for which the PROOF is here. As for the Science "theories", since when does a "Theory" need to be backed up? And since when is a dictionary deffinition, a "theory"?
Your argument and pattern of, under any name, not only leads away from the subject every time, but can be destroyed in seconds.
<cite>I applaude your desire to go against the norm and explore the realm of "impossibility" as this is where many new ideas come from, but when the numbers and experimental data prove your theories are wrong, LET IT GO!!</cite>
And I applaude you careful selective use in words, like "Norm" and "impossibility" And again your atempt to change the subject. This is not about scientific theory.
This is about your multi-name attack on the Anony Hero Feature, and the many names coming in to attack Anony Hero Feature, all claiming that DIFFERENT PERSONALITIES are answering their own posts. As you say, Where are your numbers? Admin's IP#s?
<cite>"As far as this "five faced" person you keep referring to, leave me out of it. I don't know what's going on between you and Tom and would prefer to keep it like that. I'm sure any ADMIN in here would be happy to look at my IP and see I'm exactly who I say I am, a senior mechanical engineering student in Klamath Falls, OR. NOT TOM so back off."</cite>
We three "Personalities" ( living here in Microsoft and Adobe country ) are well aware of your Oregon IP, and George's "old Grump" Oregon IP and the other guy from Oregon, what we're trying to figure out is how, "Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey Mexico" fits in!