it is astonishing to me to see such psychological resistance, to such a simple idea..
I just wanted to present "the concept", that excess electricity, into a small"load" of a water heater element, can easily heat the water,over the course of a week..(small output power, over a long period of time, CAN result in a lot of hot water available)
since there was no hard numbers presented (power out put, goal to dampen over-speed,etc, etc) I used the term "220 volt elements" as an example of utilizing a common, easily obtained, cheap item, to accomplish the goal (of heating water, over a long time - a week..)..
as for the power INTO the system, that desired result, is easily achieved using mathematical analysis, and selecting a proper heating element (again, cheap, easily obtained.. many wiring configurations) for the desired electrical performance expected..
I assumed the windmill was small - (at 100-300 watt output) ..so dissipating 20-80 watts into the water, all week long, would not damage the windmill, or heater system.. (sure, in a hurricane wind-speed burst, any linear load will eventually result in a damaged windmill.. regardless of the "load" - batteries, air, water)
as the wind speed varies, AND the voltage output would widely vary, and the all the power available (at any given moment) would still be coupled into the water.. this, I saw as an advantage to the: windmill->electricity-> hot water heating, SYSTEM
if someone want efficiency, design the resistive load for efficiency..
if someone wants to protect from over speed (with an electrical load) then design the resistive load to accomplish that.. (again, there is a very wide range of resistive heating elements, with various resistances, and then having the ability to wire in series or parallel ( two tanks with different restive circuits?, switched between them (use make, before break, switches) can give the designer a wide range, and choice of electrical performance..
you aren't just stuck..
the concept is widely adaptable (wind->electricity->hot water) depending on how you design the load (the resistive value of the heating elements) there are a wide variety of choices..easily available..
I was just trying to introduce the concept of using a hot water heater, as a load to a windmill..
your performance will vary..depending on your windmill, and the elements used.. but one can use the water heater, to heat water, over along period of time..(invest in insulation, of the tank, so even a small amount of power input, to the system, can result in a lot of hot water..over a long period of time.. (this, I see as a critical element to this design)
I would rather dump the excess power, into water - since it can store the thermal power.(better- than) air heating elements..(which a lot of people are happily designing, and using, currently..)
of all the "dump loads", I would prefer to dump into hot water (as opposed to air, for example), as that medium can store, and distribute heat, very effectively..
again I was just trying to advance a simple concept:
excess wind-genny electricity /power (coupled) -> into water, is a simple system.. no switches, no complex monitoring circuits.. if the time between "output" of the energy system, (vs, a small, constant input) the water can be very hot indeed, with even a small amount of electrical power input.. over a long period of time..
some may find this a useful model..
others it appears, think it is a very bad idea.. they would appear to have other needs, to be met.. (somehow, a simple, low power resistive load, is insufficient, for their needs)
feel free to accept, and advance the concept,(or reject it, violently...)
I just don't accept that it "wont work", or that it is "dangerous advice".. the overall concept is valid - using hot water heating elements as a "dump load"..
everyone who designs, and builds a windmill, is just as responsible to design the load system..
a windmill, can easily drive a hot heater element (simple, restive load), and heat water.. (that is my simple, point)..with-out complex switching circuits, monitoring circuits, etc, etc..
I truly hope that whatever solution you find, that works for you, you will continue to share your results, and design, and the your over all performance (meets expectations,etc)
I really wish you the best of luck, with your efforts..
I tried to advance some (conceptual)knowledge.. my humble apologies, to have wasted so much of everyones time..