your definition may be correct for automobile spark ignition engine's however
it is incorrect when we are talking about a compression ignition engine (diesel)
a quick google turned up this
http://www.aqmd.gov/hb/2002/020637a.htmldual fuel operation as defined for a diesel engine is the use of two fuels, often times
compressed natural gas and the use of a small amount of diesel injected via the engine's injection system to initiate combustion.
dual fuel mode is widely accepted in the stationary compression ignition world as the use of two fuel simultaneously, generally natural gas and a pilot injection of diesel fuel.
now bi fuel or multi fuel operation in a diesel engine refers to the use of diesel, or veggie oil, or in some cases like military engines with special injectors, gasoline, aviation gas, jet A, kerosene or any other flammable liquid fuel that is injectable.
any of these used individually or separately define the engine as bi or multifuel mode engine's
because dual fuel mode in diesels go much further back that bi fuel gasoline engine's where there is a carb and a propane mixer for instance (on the latter), it would appear to me that the term "dual fuel" applied to gas engines was a misapplication of the term.
likely it started out as some sort of sales jargon that was never corrected because it really didn't matter or it was some clever marketing ploy to separate brand x bi fuel engine from our new brand y engine such as "look at our all new for 1986 dual fuel 5.7liter high torque engine's" or some other bullcrap.
anyway the point being if you are referring to a diesel engine, dual fuel will mean that you are using a gaseous fuel "and" a pilot injection of either diesel or some other liquid fuel (generally however it refers to diesel as the approved fuel)
all of the major diesel engine manufactures that make gensets use the same definition for dual fuel mode operation, check it out.
btw, diesel engine drive power generation, dual fuel mode operation, microcogeneration, and especially engine driven battery charging systems are something i specialize in.
this is why i suggested 24vdc as a good place to start, mainly because i can show you how to increase the efficiency and output power of your system by 40% on the former and by nearly double on the latter. both equate to a much lower fuel consumption per kwatt/hr of charging.
if you have any questions i would be most happy to help you anyway i can.
this forum has been so good to me over many years now, and i am only too happy to give back where i know i can be of help.
bob g